How else to interpret this weaselly story
that tries to downplay Ron Paul's rock star reception at Google by
quoting second quarter donations as if they were the response to Ron's
successful appearance. Since second quarter donations closed two weeks
before Ron's record-setting Google visit, and we know that one Google employee
handed Ron a $2,300 maximum donation check at the Google Talk, what can
one conclude but that the Times deliberately figured out how to prop up
the Big Dems at Ron's expense?
