I wasn't going to comment on Bill Bennett's ugly, racist faux pas, but good lord, some people are trying to defend this garbage.
CALLER: I noticed the national media, you know, they talk a lot
about the loss of revenue, or the inability of the government to fund
Social Security, and I was curious, and I've read articles in recent
months here, that the abortions that have happened since Roe v. Wade,
the lost revenue from the people who have been aborted in the last
30-something years, could fund Social Security as we know it today. And
the media just doesn't -- never touches this at all.
BENNETT: Assuming they're all productive citizens?
CALLER: Assuming that they are. Even if only a portion of them were, it would be an enormous amount of revenue.
BENNETT: Maybe, maybe, but we don't know what the costs would be,
too. I think as -- abortion disproportionately occur among single
women? No.
CALLER: I don't know the exact statistics, but quite a bit are, yeah.
BENNETT: All right, well, I mean, I just don't know. I would not
argue for the pro-life position based on this, because you don't know.
I mean, it cuts both -- you know, one of the arguments in this book Freakonomics
that they make is that the declining crime rate, you know, they deal
with this hypothesis, that one of the reasons crime is down is that
abortion is up. Well --
CALLER: Well, I don't think that statistic is accurate.
BENNETT: Well, I don't think it is either, I don't think it is
either, because first of all, there is just too much that you don't
know. But I do know that it's true that if you wanted to reduce
crime, you could -- if that were your sole purpose, you could abort
every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down.
That would be an impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible
thing to do, but your crime rate would go down. So these far-out, these
far-reaching, extensive extrapolations are, I think, tricky.
Cole says: "There is nothing for him to apologize for regarding this statement. It
is a statement of fact, he was not advocating it, and, in fact, he
noted that it would be an “impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible thing to do.”" Cole goes on to say that an analogous situation would be "if you wanted to lower the rates of obesity in the United States, you could shoot all fat people."
First of all, it is most certainly NOT a fact that if every black baby in the US were aborted, crime would go down, for the very obvious, one would think even to a conservative, reason that babies don't commit crimes, now do they? Or have Republicans passed some felony colic law while I wasn't looking? And to make your fat analogy work, you'd have to shoot people who were at risk of getting fat sometime in the future. Admittedly, that would be difficult to sort out, but if you stalk enough McDonald's drive-thrus and cookie aisles at the grocery and pro-war Republican rallies and killed enough of those people you might be able to execute enough future-fatties to make a difference.
No, what immediately popped into Bennett's murderous, authoritarian mind was that typically violent conservative impulse to eliminate problems by killing people, rather like his statement that beheading drug dealers was morally permissible.
Just as George WMD Bush wants to preemptively nuke people unfortunate enough to have governments on the Republican regime-change list (only after studying the very best intelligence, I'm sure), Bill Bennett fantasizes aloud about preemptively killing people to reduce the crime rate in the US.
Now, to see why Bennett's statement is racist, you have to look at the question that set him off on his exegesis of death as a solution to society's problems. His sycophant caller had stated, assuming that Bennett would agree, no doubt, that, "the abortions that have happened since Roe v. Wade,
the lost revenue from the people who have been aborted in the last
30-something years, could fund Social Security as we know it today."
And Bennett's response? "Assuming they're all productive citizens?"
Ah, productive citizens - no shiftless layabout babies. Republicans hate those. Next, "Maybe, maybe, but we don't know what the costs would be,
too. I think as -- abortion disproportionately occur among single
women? No."
So, Bennett's thinking about demographics and abortion and, wait! He read a book about that! "....one of the arguments in this book Freakonomics
that they make is that the declining crime rate, you know, they deal
with this hypothesis, that one of the reasons crime is down is that
abortion is up."
In Freakonomics, a lightweight pop-economics book, the argument that legalized abortion reduced crime rates was not racialized, but it's clear what Bennett was thinking when he read it. And here, you get to peer into the abyss of the "conservative" mind as Bennett connects the dots. He blathers on, "I do know that it's true that if you wanted to reduce
crime, you could -- if that were your sole purpose, you could abort
every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down."
As disgusting and unworthy of defense as Bennett's train of thought clearly was, Matt Yglesias is also inspired to defend it:
"Not only is Bennett clearly not advocating a campaign of
genocidal abortion against African-Americans, but the empirical claim
here is unambiguously true. Similarly, if you aborted all the male
fetuses, all those carried by poor women, or all those carried by
Southern women, the crime rate would decline."
Oh, sure, let Bennet get away with gluing the figleaf of "an impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible
thing to do" back over his ass. Why would anyone defend this line of thinking? One might as well point out that Hiroshima was crime-free after August 6, 1945. So what? Another way to eliminate crime is to simply lock everyone up or kill them. Does anyone think that Bill Bennett hasn't thought of that?
Let's just reduce Bennett's "reasoning" down to the bones, why don't we? Just kill all the poor women, all the black women, all the single women and any other women who might get pregnant and bring little criminals into the world. Why take chances that they'll get pregnant again?
Then you'd have the perfect conservative utopia.