peaceblogs


advertising

Newsvine poll

Demand Ron Paul

Bloglines

Firefox


  • Get Firefox!

google


  • Google


  • Search WWW
    Search UnFairWitness

BlogAds

blogads advertising

Abu Ghraib Torture Photos

  • Ag15
    The photos America doesn't want seen MORE photographs have been leaked of Iraqi citizens tortured by US soldiers at the notorious Abu Ghraib prison on the outskirts of Baghdad. Tonight the SBS Dateline program plans to broadcast about 60 previously unpublished photographs that the US Government has been fighting to keep secret in a court case with the American Civil Liberties Union. Although a US judge last year granted the union access to the photographs following a freedom-of-information request, the US Administration has appealed against the decision on the grounds their release would fuel anti-American sentiment. Some of the photos are similar to those published in 2004, others are different. They include photographs of six corpses, although the circumstances of their deaths are not clear. There are also pictures of what appear to be burns and wounds from shotgun pellets. The executive producer of Dateline, Mike Carey, said he was showing the pictures leaked to his program because it was important people understood what had happened at Abu Ghraib. Seven US guards were jailed following publication of the first batch of Abu Ghraib photographs in April 2004. Mr Carey said he could not explain why the photographs had not yet been published, as he thought it was likely that some journalists had them. "It think it's strange, maybe they think its more of the same."
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 03/2004

« June 2005 | Main | August 2005 »

Sunday, July 31, 2005

Judy Miller and another Norquist theory

Josh Marshall reminds us that Patrick Fitzgerald has a history of run-ins with Judy Miller:

Don't forget: This isn't the first time Plame prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald has tangled with Judy Miller while investigating a leak out of the Bush White House. 

A little more than a year ago, I reported on TPM how Fitzgerald had quite aggressively investigated another Bush White House leak in late 2001 and early 2002.  Fitzgerald had been investigating three Islamic charities accused of supporting terrorism -- the Holy Land Foundation, the Global Relief Foundation, and the Benevolence International Foundation.  But just before his investigators could swoop in with warrants, two of the charities in question got wind of what was coming and, apparently, were able to destroy a good deal of evidence.

What tipped them off were calls from two reporters at the New York Times
who'd been leaked information about the investigation by folks at the White House. 

One of those two reporters was Judy Miller.

Downthread, a TPM poster asks this reasonable question:

What reason would Miller have to protect these charities?  HLF was a palestinian-run org.  I think Benevolence and Global Relief Foundation were saudi.

Well, what if Judy was helping Karl Rove and Grover Norquist out? 

This goes back to a long-running feud in Republican and neocon circles that intensified after 9/11.  Originally, the conflict was between establishment Republicans and Israel's American Amen Corner, which contained a likudnik faction which devoted a fair amount of hasbara time  to demonizing Muslims and Arab Muslims in particular.  Grover Norquist, being the conservative BaseMeister I keep harping about, was trying to bring muslims into the conservative fold, arguing (correctly) that they held shared views on many issues dear to social conservatives.  Read this article by Norquist in which he explains, in part:

George W. Bush was elected President of the United States of America because of the Muslim vote.

The what?

That's right, the Muslim vote. There  are roughly six million muslim-Americans. Hard data on their voting habits is surprisingly hard to come by, because national polling groups do not yet include "Muslim" as a full-fledged religious category (Protestant, Catholic, Jew, and "other'). But according to surveys by national Muslim groups, Bush won more than 70 percent of Muslims who voted. In Florida, that totaled 55,000 people, who, according to an exit poll by the Tampa Bay Islamic Center, favored Bush over Gore by 20 to 1. According to this exit poll, Bush got 88 percent of the vote to Gore's four percent, with eight percent voting for Nadar. The      margin of victory for Bush over Gore in the Muslim vote was 46,200, many times greater than his statewide margin of victory. The Muslim vote won Florida for Bush.

Of course, the anti-muslim faction hated this.  Then came the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

This issue of the Republican party embracing Muslims is what Frank Gaffney, various Freepers, neocons and Israel-boosting anti-muslim factions and Norquist parted ways over, in a vicious public brawl.  (here, here, here, here, here )  It was in this atmosphere of  barely controlled hysteria in Republican ranks over whether Muslims were voters or terrorists who should be rounded up into internment camps or deported (this argument still rages today) that the Fitzgerald Islamic charity probe began.

In the TPM post, Josh writes, "But just before his investigators could swoop in with warrants, two of the charities in question got wind of what was coming and, apparently, were able to destroy a good deal of evidence."  What evidence would they be destroying?  Maybe evidence that would embarrass the White House even more that smiling photos with Sami al-Arian?  Who is the White House's go-to guy for the Muslim organizations.....the role that earned Grover Norquist the hatred of the Horowitzians, the Amen-Corner neocons, and the xenophobic right-wing closed-border rabble of the malkin ilk?

Fitzgerald was investigating Muslim charities - the Holy Land Foundation, the Global Relief Foundation, and the Benevolence International Foundation - all associated with the Bush White House and Rove through Grover Norquist.  You can be sure that Norquist, directly involved in wooing these very organizations for the Bush campaign through his own Islamic Institute, was under Fitzgerald's scrutiny, which would prevent him from doing the tip-off directly.  What a grand scheme to have the Whitehouse's favorite press water-carrier to do it for them. 

As Arianna notes in the above-linked post,

The more I'm reading about Judy Miller and her actions leading up to and during the early days of the war, and then through the unfolding Plame-Rove-Libby-Gonzalez-Card scandal, the more I’m struck by the special access and relationships she enjoyed with many of the key players in the Iraq debacle (which, at the end of the day, is really what Plamegate is all about). 

For starters, of course, we have her still unfolding involvement in the Plame leak.  Earlier this month, Howard Kurtz reported that Miller and Libby spoke a few days before Novak outed Plame -- and I’m hearing that the Libby/Miller conversation occurred over breakfast in Washington. Did Valerie Plame come up -- and, if so, who brought her up? There is no question that Miller was angry at Joe Wilson… and continues to be. A social acquaintance of Miller told me that, once, when she spoke of Wilson, it was with “a passionate and heated disgust that went beyond the political and included an irrelevant bit of deeply personal innuendo about him, her mouth twisting in hatred.”

Miller’s special relationships go much further than Scooter Libby, Richard Perle and the rest of the neocon establishment. Take her involvement as an embedded reporter during the war with the Pentagon’s Mobile Exploitation Team (MET) Alpha -- the unit charged with hunting down Saddam’s WMD. As extensively reported by both Kurtz and New York Magazine’s Franklin Foer, Miller’s time with the unit was highly unusual.

First, there was the fact that she landed the plum assignment in the first place. It would give her first dibs on the biggest story of the war… the hoped-for reveal of Saddam’s much-touted WMD (with much of the touting done by Miller herself and her special sources). Was this the reward for her pro-administration prewar reporting?
[...]
Foer cites military and New York Times sources as saying that Miller’s assignment was so sensitive that Don Rumsfeld himself signed off on it. Once embedded, Miller acted as much more than a reporter. Kurtz quotes one military officer as saying that the MET Alpha unit became a “Judith Miller team.” Another officer said that Miller “came in with a plan. She was leading them… She ended up almost hijacking the mission.” A third officer, a senior staffer of the 75th Exploitation Task Force, of which MET Alpha was a part, put it this way: “It’s impossible to exaggerate the impact she had on the mission of this unit, and not for the better.”

What did Miller do to create such an impression? According to Kurtz, she wasn’t afraid to throw her weight around, threatening to write critical stories and complain to her friends in very high places if things didn’t go her way. “Judith,” said an Army officer, “was always issuing threats of either going to the New York Times or to the secretary of defense.  There was nothing veiled about that threat.”

In one specific instance, she used her friendship with Major General David Petraeus to force a lower ranking officer to reverse an order she was unhappy about. (Can we stop for a moment and take the full measure of how unbelievable this whole thing is?)

Unbelievable, yes, but only if Judith Miller was a normal reporter rather than the White House operative she has been revealed as.  Maybe Fitzgerald, realizing that the Plame investigation features the same cast of characters as the botched Muslim charity investigation, has decided that this time, they aren't getting away with it.

Wednesday, July 27, 2005

"Jeff Gannon" lectures Freeper on press credentials for Air America

Too funny.  JD Guckert, posting as ConservativeMajority on Brownshirt Republic:

For the record, to be credentialed as a reporter one must demonstrate that he receives ober 50% of his income from the practice of journalism. If this guy is a lawyer, it is doubtful he qualifies in this regard. Gannon_righttalk

Further, for Air America to be credentialed as a news service, it must be a going concern that derives its income from adertising, subscptions, etc. It may not be funded directly by partisan interests or engage in political advocacy. Air America doesn't qualify to be credentialed as a legitimate news source.

Someone needs to contact the Senate Press Gallery since it issues credentials for the Washington press corps. Talk to Joe Keenan, 202-224-0241.

You're the expert, JD!

Webcast_gannon

Monday, July 25, 2005

Choosing Tyranny

This guy is a big pro-war blogger and a vocal advocate of "spreading democracy and freedom" to Iraq.

Search me

: I say it's a good thing that New York police will start random bag searches on the subways.

Oh, I know it will be inconvenient when I'm late for a meeting and it's 120-degrees down there and I fear there will be a line. Nonetheless, if and when the cops search me, I'll thank them.

This morning on Today, they rolled out the "privacy" boogeyman. "Privacy advocates" were expressing concern. Who the hell are these "privacy advocates?" Name two. But listening to reporters, they seem to be everywhere. You just don't know it. Because they're very private.

And what precisely is the privacy problem? If the cops catch you carrying something illegal, well, you shouldn't be carrying anything illegal. If they catch you carrying the latest Playboy -- or, more embarrassing, Radar -- then don't worry; they've seen worse.

Are random screenings going to catch the next terrorist ready to kill people? We'll never know. But it is worth the effort.

Elsewhere, bloviating on about how "we" can't allow the mullahs to come to power in Iraq (this was before the mullahs came to power in Iraq), this same guy says, "And you cannot convince me that any people will willingly choose tyranny." 

Saturday, July 23, 2005

Who forged the fake Niger documents?


Suburban Guerilla catches an interesting angle in a Guardian article:

Leaking the identity of an undercover agent is a serious crime under US law, but prosecutors would have to prove that the leaker was aware of the agent’s covert status. However, the investigation, led by federal prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, is reported also to be investigating possible charges of perjury and obstruction of justice.

Meanwhile, a parallel investigation is under way into who forged the Niger documents. They are known to have been passed to an Italian journalist by a former Italian defence intelligence officer, Rocco Martino, in October 2002, but their origins have remained a mystery. Mr Martino has insisted to the Italian press that he was “a tool used by someone for games much bigger than me”, but has not specified who that might be.

A source familiar with the inquiry said investigators were examining whether former US intelligence agents may have been involved in possible collaboration with Iraqi exiles determined to prove that Saddam Hussein had a nuclear programme.

Hmmm.  Is there a parallel investigation or is Fitzgerald just expanding the original investigation??

In other news, the poor guy shot in the Stockwell Tube station yesterday turned out to be a Brazilian with no connection whatsoever to the London bombings.

Friday, July 22, 2005

Bolton/Miller - The Plot Thickens

Judithmillercrimes_2From Steve Clemons at The Washington Note:

SCOOP: John Bolton Was Regular Source for Judith Miller WMD and National Security Reporting

TWN has just learned from a highly placed source -- and in the right place to know -- that John Bolton was a regular source for Judith Miller's New York Times WMD and national security reports.

The source did not have any knowledge on whether Bolton was one of Miller's sources on the Valerie Plame story she was preparing, but argues that he was a regular source otherwise.

It's all "thickening."

Interestinger and interestinger.  Of course, Justin has already bragged about breaking the Bolton involvement. For those interested in speculation on the Joe Wilson/Valerie Plame/Niger uranium/How-the-hell-did-they-pull-this-off story, here's my entry into the fray.

Thursday, July 21, 2005

More American mercenaries

Daniel McAdams on what Congress did while you weren't paying attention yesterday.
But what use is the application of the Lenin and Trotsky perfected techniques of the coup d'etat without the stabilization shock troops on the ground to consolidate the gains? Lebanon's Cedar Revolution was ambiguous to say the least. Imagine what could have been done with stabilization troops available to husband the votes into a more creative expression of the universal democratic imperative.
Read the whole thing.

Sunday, July 17, 2005

A must-read book on the Iraq invasion?

You couldn't ask for a better book review:

No 10 blocks envoy's book on Iraq 

Matthew Cooper's testimony about Karl Rove

For all us subscription-impaired newsjunkies:

"What I Told The Grand Jury"
      By Matthew Cooper
      Time Magazine

    Monday 25 July 2005 Issue

Matthew Cooper reveals exactly what Karl   Rove told   him--and what the special counsel zeroed in on.

My Photo

I also post at


Ron Paul on Technorati

LewRockwell Blog

  • Add to Google

newsvine ron paul

Recent Posts

Blog Roll I

Blog stuff

Blogads1