peaceblogs


advertising

Newsvine poll

Demand Ron Paul

Bloglines

Firefox


  • Get Firefox!

google


  • Google


  • Search WWW
    Search UnFairWitness

BlogAds

blogads advertising

Abu Ghraib Torture Photos

  • Ag15
    The photos America doesn't want seen MORE photographs have been leaked of Iraqi citizens tortured by US soldiers at the notorious Abu Ghraib prison on the outskirts of Baghdad. Tonight the SBS Dateline program plans to broadcast about 60 previously unpublished photographs that the US Government has been fighting to keep secret in a court case with the American Civil Liberties Union. Although a US judge last year granted the union access to the photographs following a freedom-of-information request, the US Administration has appealed against the decision on the grounds their release would fuel anti-American sentiment. Some of the photos are similar to those published in 2004, others are different. They include photographs of six corpses, although the circumstances of their deaths are not clear. There are also pictures of what appear to be burns and wounds from shotgun pellets. The executive producer of Dateline, Mike Carey, said he was showing the pictures leaked to his program because it was important people understood what had happened at Abu Ghraib. Seven US guards were jailed following publication of the first batch of Abu Ghraib photographs in April 2004. Mr Carey said he could not explain why the photographs had not yet been published, as he thought it was likely that some journalists had them. "It think it's strange, maybe they think its more of the same."
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 03/2004

« April 2005 | Main | June 2005 »

Sunday, May 29, 2005

Smoke and Mirrors: Operation "Lightning"

Operation "Lightning" has supposedly been launched and the first casualties have been a 3 Iraqi guards killed by an insurgent car bomb at the Iraqi Ministry of Oil on Palestine Street in Baghdad and a British soldier killed by a roadside bomb in the Sadrist stronghold of Amara.


Oil Wars makes an interesting point about the so-called "cordon" of some 40,000 Iraqi troops backed by the Americans around Baghdad:

This is just so off the wall on so many levels. First, even if they did seal off Baghdad how exactly does that help them? There are just as many insurgents inside Baghdad as there are outside. So what is this going to accomplish – insurgent Ali in Baghdad won’t be able to visit his cousin, insurgent Omar, over in Ramadi?

Secondly, given that the U.S couldn’t even cordon off Fallujah properly and most of the insurgents there got out what makes anyone think that 40,000 Iraqi government troops can effectively cordon off Baghdad? Lets keep in mind out of any given 40,000 Iraqi troops probably at least 20,000 of them are working for the insurgents. Not to mention, if you have all these troops spread out to make a circle around Baghdad they will have to be in small isolated groups that will make easy pickings for the insurgents. Lets see how long the 40,000 saps who get assigned to this detail agree to put up with that.

Quite frankly, this shows that things in Iraq are in even worse shape than I had thought.

Pre-destruction,  Fallujah was a town of 300,000 souls, 70-90% of whom were thought to have fled before the cordon went up. Baghdad is a city of 5 million. Do the math.

UPDATE:  Well, things are off to a predictable start:
  • Before dawn, insurgents attacked an Iraqi army checkpoint in Youssifiyah, 20 kilometers (12 miles) south of Baghdad, killing nine soldiers and injuring one, said Dr. Dawood Al Taaei of nearby Mahmoudiya hospital.

  • Gunmen killed two police sergeants employed by the Iraqi Cabinet in a drive-by shooting Sunday in Dora, said police Capt. Firas Qaiti.

  • Another two police commandos were killed and five injured in a car bomb blast at 11 a.m. (0700GMT) at Madain about 20 kilometers (14 miles) southeast of Baghdad, police Col. Selam Mehmood.

  • A suicide car bomber, apparently targeting a U.S. convoy, exploded his vehicle Sunday and killed two Iraqis and injured nine others in northern Iraq, said police Brig. Sarhat Qadir.

    The attack happened near the headquarters of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan in Tuz Khormato, south of Kirkuk, 290 kilometers (180 miles) north of Baghdad, said Qadir.

Saturday, May 28, 2005

Recommended reading

John Cole is going on my blogroll for this series of posts. 

John Cole
Rick Moran
John Cole

It's a treat to read such a well argued conservative criticism of the idiotic arguments by Malkin, Hewitt and Barber. I can't remember how I came across this, so if it was your blog, sorry for the lack of credit.

Shades of the Massad witch hunt at Columbia: This post at Lenin's Tomb relates a situation developing at SOAS, University of London.  Here's hoping some publicity will help head off a looming disaster.

Friday, May 27, 2005

Sliding down the slope

Forced shaving of prisoners and tattooing. Where have we seen this before?

Good News from Iraq!

Only follow this link if you're one of the reality-based community. Otherwise, you'd best keep your illusions intact by sticking to the pure, unfiltered Chrenkoff version:

Good electricity news from Iraq

Via Jim Henley

Igniting the Sectarian Tinderbox

Under the absurdly self-evident headline, "Many Iraqis See Sectarian Roots in New Killings" (duh) the NY Times, after relating how Hassan al-Nuaimi, an Iraqi Sunni cleric, was found dumped in an empty lot with a hole drilled in his head and both eyes gouged out, quotes Ghassan al-Atiyya, a secular Shiite and the director of the Iraqi Foundation for Development and Democracy, a Baghdad research institute: "The Americans, instead of strengthening liberal and secular, they are now hostage of Sciri," he said, referring to a religious Shiite political group, "and Kurds."

So, amid the "welter of allegations about Shiite death squads going after Sunni Arabs" what better way to foment sectarian hate and violence than to have 40,000 Kurdish peshmergas and SCIRI's Iranian trained Badr Brigade Shiite militia backed by 10,000 Americans blockade  Baghdad and carry out raids? 

This assault suggests the stiletto bootprint of Rice and the hamfisted thuggishness of Rumsfeld, both of whom were recently imposed on the Iraqi "government" where they apparently pressured al-Jafaari to act more American. If the cordon and massive raids really happen, the insurgent reaction is predictable - expect Mosul to erupt into violence (and possibly Kirkuk) just as it did when the US concentrated forces to crush Fallujah. It would also be an optimum time for the newly re-emerged Muqtada al-Sadr to consolidate his hold on Basra and other Sadrist areas of southern Iraq.

Wednesday, May 18, 2005

US mock-executioners in Iraq

The Australian Daily Telegraph reports:

Mock executions – in which a prisoner is made to believe his death is imminent – are expressly prohibited by the US army's interrogation policy.

The details were described in documents sought by the American Civil Liberties Union under a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.

On July 13, 2003, Captain Shawn L. Martin, of the 3rd Armoured Cavalry Regiment took an Iraqi welder out to the desert and made him dig his own grave before pretending to shoot him, according to documents.

Capt Martin wanted information on a bombing. The welder was released.

Capt Martin also captured eight people in a vehicle and fired his gun to make the seven passengers believe he had killed the driver. He then went to the home of a man, whose identity was provided by the driver, and threatened to kill him in front of his family.

Capt Martin was court-martialled, convicted of aggravated assault and battery, and sentenced to 45 days confinement and loss of $US12,000 ($A15,900) in pay.

The other mock execution involved a second lieutenant with the 3rd Brigade of 1st Armoured Division who received administrative punishment as well as an other-than-honourable discharge from the service.

There was no Koran-flushing, though.  No US soldier would go that far.

Tuesday, May 17, 2005

Galloway: A Pack of Lies

If you ever wanted to hear a bunch of US Senators get told off, here's your chance.

George Galloway: Your case for war was a pack of lies.

MP3 courtesy of Crooks and Liars (they have a Realplayer video version if you prefer)

Are the documents implicating Galloway forgeries?

Galloway vs. The US Senate: Transcript of Statement 

Monday, May 16, 2005

RAF Hercules downed by AA fire in Iraq



The Telegraph is reporting that the RAF Hercules which crashed January 30, 2005 - the day of the Iraqi elections - was downed by an AA weapon.

An interim Ministry of Defence report has ruled out almost everything apart from enemy fire and it was suggested that a missile or rocket-propelled grenade could have brought down the aircraft.

But an official told The Daily Telegraph yesterday that the report concluded that the Hercules had been shot down by anti-aircraft artillery, as it flew at a low altitude, possibly 150ft.

"It was shredded by a multi-barrelled 20mm canon," the official said. "They have worked out that's what caused the crash."

The gun is believed to have been a 1960s twin-barrel Zu-23, made in China or the Soviet Union, left over from the Saddam Hussein regime.

It has an effective range of 2,000 yards and can be mounted on a lorry or set on wheels.

It is not known why the Hercules, which was equipped with sophisticated defensive measures, was flying at low altitude for the 40-minute trip.

Continue reading "RAF Hercules downed by AA fire in Iraq" »

Sunday, May 15, 2005

Kamal Nawash Republican Campaign Rally

All right, what's the deal with this weird rally?  Glenn Reynolds is flogging it, so there's a clue.  The other vector appears to be Horowitz.   

Hussein Ibish, pointing out the absurd list of "sponsors" (Like Free Republic's RighTalk, a dress shop in Arizona and a couple of obscure right-wing blogs, for example) says it's a campaign rally for outcast Republican Kamal Nawash.

On Saturday, May 14, "Free Muslims Against Terrorism," the group set up to stop criticism of Kamal Nawash by right-wing Zionists like Daniel Pipes and bolster his failed career as a Republican party candidate for local office in Virginia, is holding a “March against Terror” rally in Washington, DC (for more background on Nawash and “Free Muslims” see this). Representatives of most major Arab American and American Muslim groups in Washington received invitations to participate in the March, but all declined given Kamal’s unsavory background and activities, and his close association with and open courting of those most hostile to these communities such as the professional bigot Daniel Pipes and others. Indeed, one of the purposes of the March may be to force the mainstream groups to choose between having to join this unsavory figure and give his appalling efforts undeserved credibility, or decline and face future accusations from the likes of Pipes that their failure to join Kamal’s March indicates some sort of secret support for terrorism against the United States.

Nonetheless, Kamal has been vigorously promoting, with the help of his patrons Pipes, David Horowitz and other enemies of the community, the March and a growing list of “endorsers.” In an effort to inform the public, and to examine more closely who is willing to get into bed with whom, I have assembled the following notes on the organizations he says endorse his “March.” To call it a bunch of strange bedfellows does not really do this list justice. We are looking at everything from clothes shops in Arizona, Moonies, right-wing Zionists, and Christian fundamentalists, to Iranian monarchists, Iraqi supporters of the occupation, Darfurian exiles and Lebanese Phalangists. A few are legitimate organizations, many are fakes and some are certifiable. Some are blogs, some are empty websites, and many are individuals or small groups listed twice or thrice. At least one, the Muslim Canadian Congress, has repeatedly demanded to be removed from the list, but, true to form, Kamal persists in listing them. Almost all are tiny and on some fringe or other especially a grab-bag of ultra-right crackpots, and many are openly hostile to Islam and Muslims. Stranger than fiction, these are the groups that will be rallying in Washington against terrorism on May 14 under the banner “Free Muslims against Terrorism.”

   Whatever it was, the Muslim-bashers are gleefully proclaiming that the sparse turnout means Muslims really are all terrorists.

More on the "Free Muslims" here. Ibish:

It looks like an effort to force people into choosing to give Kamal completely undeserved credibility by joining him, or face possible denunciation as agents of terror by declining the poisoned offer. It's a typically crude ploy, and nobody should be fooled for a second by it.

The only remaining question is: who is giving Kamal the money to allow him to turn himself out like this, complete with office and staff? Since he still has yet to file his 990 financial disclosure forms, we'll just have to wait to discover who is the Mac Daddy pimping Kamal, if indeed we ever really find out. If we do, I doubt we'll be too surprised.

Sounds about right.

Afghan elections, poppies and Koran-flushing

Martial at De Spectaculis looks skeptically at the idea that the  Newsweek article about Koran-flushing is the cause of the riots in Afghanistan, pointing out that similar stories have been in circulation since 2003.

Team Bush to scold Iraqis again

Well, I guess since Rumsfeld's lecture didn't work, those recalcitrant Iraqis are in for a real scolding now. Team Bush is sending in the Big Nanny:Rice

ARBIL : US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice made a surprise visit to Iraq to bolster the country's fledgling government just hours after US troops announced an end to a campaign to rout insurgents near the Syrian border.

As her visit got underway, the discovery of more bodies and a new string of attacks in Iraq underlined the severity of a security situation that has seen hundreds killed this month alone.

Rice arrived in the northern Kurdish city of Arbil on a C-17 military plane from Qatar. She had flown from Washington in utter secrecy, with only a few aides informed of the trip.

So, Rice sneaks into Arbil to lecture the Kurds, first:

The secretary of state flew immediately to Salahuddin, near Arbil, where she was to meet with the Kurdish leader Massoud Barzani, in a convoy of Blackhawk helicopters with Apache escorts.

Then, it's on to Baghdad for the Shiites' spanking:

Rice also was slated to meet with Iraq Prime Minister Ibrahim Jaafari and senior cabinet members at 3:00 pm (1100 GMT) in Baghdad before holding a press conference.

On the agenda: Stop de-Baathing all the Sunnis and get tough with the resistance. 

"I think it is something that I would like to discuss with the leadership, the composition of that committee, and how (...) they can ensure that there is participation of all Iraqis, including Sunnis, in this process."
[...]
Rice was unfazed by the wave of violence that has left 400 civilians dead since the start of the month, saying it was an attempt by insurgents to derail the political process and to respond to a major offensive launched against them by Iraqi security forces.

"To defeat them by having a political alternative that is strong," Rice said the Iraqis were now "going to have to intensify their efforts to demonstrate that the political process is the answer for the Iraqi people."

There was a major offensive launched by Iraqi security forces?  I guess the press didn't get the memo.  Ah, well, it's just diplo-speak for stop embarrassing us with all these car bombs and assassinations!  Start cracking heads like a real government!


UPDATE: Here's an explanation of the committee to which Rice refers above, by Chris Albritton.

Saturday, May 14, 2005

Mona Charen, scourge of the "liberal media"

Is conservative right-wingnuttiness a degenerative disease?

From deep within the echo chamber, Charen rolls out the stock conservative whining points on the Iraqi Oil-For-Food wannabe-scandal (to prove she's objective, it's titled "Friends of Saddam"):

Good morning, and welcome to today's edition of "What's News?" A Senate committee has released a report alleging that two prominent European opponents of the Iraq War were paid off by Saddam Hussein as part of the U.N. Oil for Food program. I'll reveal their names in a moment. [Only Mona knows this important information.]

For the record, here's the story Mona is whining about from the Times (which reported the story hours before the US media but they don't get credit because they're British):

Mr Galloway, who overturned a 10,000 Labour majority in Bethnal Green & Bow, dismissed the congressional report last night as a “Republican Party dirty trick”. He repeated his earlier denial that he had received any oil allocations from Iraq.

“For the 500th time, I have never seen a barrel of oil, never owned one, never bought one, never sold one, and neither has anyone on my behalf,” he said. “The Mariam Appeal’s finances were exhaustively investigated by the Charities Commission and nothing improper was found.

“This committee has never written to me, never spoken to me and has not even acknowledged my offer last year to appear in front of them, so it is not much of an investigation.”

Back to Mona:

You will search in vain for this story on the print or Web versions of The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, or the Chicago Tribune. I found it in The Washington Times and The New York Sun. [Actually, only Mona searched in vain.]

The point here is not to beat up the liberal media for their lack of coverage, but merely to observe that news judgment - that sacred totem of journalism - is not and probably never can be a neutral or unbiased matter.

What the New York Times and New York Sun respectively believe about the world around them is reflected in what they put on the front page - or cover at all.

Since Charen claims to have looked in the NY Times, how could she have missed Old Reliable, Judith Miller:

Hussein Gave Oil to French and British Officials, Senate Panel Says
By JUDITH MILLER
Published: May 12, 2005

Mona, Mona!  Don't you know the NY Times already surrendered to conservative political correctness?  Where's the love?

OK, how about the Washington Post

Panel Connects Oil Program To Europeans
By Colum Lynch
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, May 12, 2005; A16

The Chicago Tribune?

Committee Releases Oil-For-Food Documents
By NICK WADHAMS
Associated Press Writer
Published May 13, 2005, 7:50 AM CDT

LA Times?

Oil-for-Food Report Alleges Officials Gained
May 12, 2005
By Maggie Farley, Times Staff Writer

Enough, yet?

Unburdened by facts and still cheery after toiling in the archives of the liberal media for our edification, Mona carries on:

That's why it is essential to get your news from more than one source - preferably from two sources with differing biases. As for me, I like to get both sides of the story - the right and the far right (kidding).

  Oh, that Mona - so funny.  Just one more example of why conservatives are  famous for their sense of humor.

Thursday, May 12, 2005

Sabrina Harman: It was just a joke

A U.S. Army reservist accused of attaching wires to a hooded Iraqi prisoner did so in a joke shared with the prisoner, her lawyer said at the start of a court-martial said on Thursday.

Spc. Sabrina Harman, who pleaded innocent to charges of conspiracy, dereliction of duty and maltreatment of subordinates, also photographed abuses because she wanted to document what she felt was wrongful behavior, attorney Frank Spinner said.

Sabrindocumnmentingadeadiraqi
 

The former pizza restaurant worker, who joined the Army reserves after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, is linked to several of the most notorious Iraqi prisoner abuse photos.

She is accused of posing before a pyramid of naked Iraqi prisoners and photographing them as they were forced to masturbate. She is also charged with placing wires on an Iraqi detainee dubbed Gilligan by guards and telling him he would be electrocuted if he stepped off a box in a picture seen worldwide.

"This was a joke. Gilligan understood it to be a joke. It was all part of their relationship," Spinner said. "It was a relationship beyond what the pictures showed."

Just_a_joke

This "defense" is almost as stupid as the Cheerleader Defense.

Chrenkoff's Good News

A series of interesting posts here on MediaWatch the upshot of which is that Arthur "Good News!" Chrenkoff admitted that he is paid by the Wall Street Journal for his efforts. Arthur sort of ...uh, denied this at first, but finally came clean.

Media Watch: Where we were wrong was in our report of Arthur Chrenkoff’s relationship with OpinionJournal.com. We said that Arthur was not paid and that his blog (Arthur’s own description) was published without editing.

That information came directly from Dr Chrenkoff. I spoke at length to him before this story. Naturally I contacted him after your latest column to clarify why he had given us false information.

Arthur has apologised for misleading us and given me permission to provide this quote from our conversation:

Media Watch: Do they pay you?

Arthur Chrenkoff: They do actually – a pretty insignificant amount – I started doing it for free but they suggested they might pay me a rather a nominal amount. It’s certainly not in line with what is paid for opinion pieces … I do apologise, with hindsight I should have told you the truth. As I said I was a bit taken aback. I didn’t see how it was relevant to the story but having said that I do apologise.

MW: What about editing. Do they edit your pieces?

AC: I told you they didn’t edit it because to my mind editing means to make substantial changes, but they do have a look at it before they publish it.

The false information that Dr Chrenkoff provided was not significant, but we apologise for those small errors. We’ll put a correction on our website.

We stand by our argument that The Australian’s columnist Janet Albrechtsen misrepresented the nature and source of “Good News from Iraq”.

The various back and forths posts are linked on the right sidebar.

Via Tim Dunlop at The Road to Surfdom, who adds a discussion of the difference between journalism and trawling the internet in search of good news, as well as addressing Chrenkoff's false claim that he does "no commentary."

Mr Chrenkoff's comments that he "doesn't do any commentary" and that he merely tries to "redress the balance" are palpable nonsense. The simple fact of presenting a highly edited selection of media and US government stories on Iraq under the heading of "Good news from Iraq" is itself a form of commentary. The idea that leaving out the "bad news"--part of the reality of what is happening--is merely "redressing the balance" is a joke. His blog is a transparent project of propaganda posing as a site of unbiased information (as he says, "I just save people the effort and present in a convenient form the other side of the story").

Iraq's needy hospitals

Hospitals in Iraq are in terrible shape, as Eric Umansky reminds us.  If Baghdad's biggest hospital actually runs out of sutures, what is the likely state of hospitals in more isolated areas? 

At least one Iraqi blogger is doing something to address the situation. Raed Jarrar and his friends have already delivered several batches of medical supplies to the hospital in Fallujah, so bypass the corruption and waste of the American military occupation and the Iraqi bureaucrats, hit Raed's Paypal button (upper right sidebar) and help supply Iraq's doctors and hospitals with desperately needed basic medical supplies. 

Although Raed and Niki along with family and friends are doing an admirable, necessary job with this project, you won't see them mentioned by the usual blog triumphalists because they only jarvis about bloggers who cheer the war and love the occupation. Those types have to pretend everything is swell in Iraq or their American audience might get upset.

Mayhem in Iraq

Iraqi resistance wipes out entire squad of Marines

The Washington Post reports:

The explosion enveloped the armored vehicle in flames, sending orange balls of fire bubbling above the trees along the Euphrates River near the Syrian border.

Marines in surrounding vehicles threw open their hatches and took off running across the plowed fields, toward the already blackening metal of the destroyed vehicle. Shouting, they pulled to safety those they could, as the flames ignited the bullets, mortar rounds, flares and grenades inside, rocketing them into the sky and across pastures.

Gunnery Sgt. Chuck Hurley emerged from the smoke and turmoil around the vehicle, circling toward the spot where helicopters would later land to pick up casualties. As he passed one group of Marines, he uttered just one sentence: "That was the same squad."

Among the four Marines killed and 10 wounded when an explosive device erupted under their amtrac on Wednesday were the last battle-ready members of a squad that four days earlier had battled foreign fighters holed up in a house in the town of Ubaydi. In that fight, two squad members were killed and five wounded.

In 96 hours of fighting and ambushes in far western Iraq, the squad had ceased to be.

Every member of the squad--one of three that make up the 1st Platoon of Lima Company, 3rd Battalion, 25th Regiment--had been killed or wounded, Marines here said. All told, the 1st Platoon, which Hurley commands, had sustained 60 percent casualties, demolishing it as a fighting force.

"They used to call it Lucky Lima," said Maj. Steve Lawson, commander of the company. "That turned around and bit us."

Attacks kill 69 in Iraq, Iraqi General assassinated

In other news from Iraq:

A car bomb exploded near a market in eastern Baghdad, killing at least six people and wounding 13, said police 1st Lt. Mazin Saeed. The blast also set some shops on fire in the New Baghdad area of the capital and destroyed 10 cars parked nearby, he said.

Elsewhere in Baghdad, suspected insurgents shot and killed Brig. Gen. Iyad Imad Mahdi as he drove to work at the Ministry of Defense. Col. Fadhil Muhammed Mobarak was shot and killed as he traveled to the Interior Ministry, where he led its police control room, police said.

Two car bombs also exploded in the northern city of Kirkuk, 180 miles north of Baghdad, police said. One blast occurred near a Shiite mosque, killing two people and wounding two, said police Capt. Sarhad Talabani.

The other exploded at a site where explosives experts were dismantling a roadside bomb that residents had found, said police Brig. Gen. Sarhad Qader. Two of the experts were wounded by the blast, which also destroyed nearby vehicles, Qader said.

In Saddam Hussein's hometown of Tikrit, 80 miles north of Baghdad, a suicide car bomb exploded in a small market near a police station, killing at least 33 people and injuring 92, police and hospital officials said. The attacker swerved into a crowd of day laborers waiting to be picked up for work at construction sites after heavy security prevented the vehicle from reaching the station, police said.

About 90 minutes later, in Hawija, a town 150 miles north of Baghdad, a man with hidden explosives slipped past security guards at a police and army recruitment center and blew himself up outside the building where applicants were lined up. At least 30 people were killed and 35 injured, police said.
In western Baghdad, gunmen clashed with a police patrol on a highway, killing one officer and wounding another.

Another bomb exploded at Iraq's largest fertilizer plant in the southern city of Basra, killing one person and wounding 23, police and employees said. The blast set fire to a gas pipeline and destroyed about 60 percent of the plant.

Iraqi government in action

Meanwhile, the US military and the New Iraqi Parliamenttm are squabbling over who gets a building in Baghdad.

National assembly members have long requested a meeting hall protected by Iraqis, but the campaign picked up speed after a tearful legislator appeared before the body last month to recount how U.S. soldiers had manhandled him at a checkpoint leading into the Green Zone. Spurred on by outraged legislators, the speaker of the assembly threatened to suspend meetings until they found an alternative venue.

Around the same time, a committee led by Ahmad Chalabi, the controversial politician who's now deputy prime minister, was searching for a suitable site outside the Green Zone. They spotted the rose-colored building next door. Chalabi and other committee members took a tour of the grounds, praised the renovations and announced their findings to their fellow lawmakers:

"All the building needs now is furniture, and we can install that within a week," a confident Chalabi told the assembly.

Legislators voted in favor of the move, infuriating U.S. and Iraqi defense officials. They weren't about to let go of the building without a fight, said one senior Iraqi defense official who was present when Chalabi took his tour. He didn't want his name published for fear of inflaming sensitivities surrounding the issue.

"If Chalabi comes back, we'll shoot him," the angry official said in jest.

Wednesday, May 11, 2005

Kevin Sites on the Fallujah mosque shooting

Fallujahroad_1 NPR has posted the unedited Sites video of the Fallujah mosque shooting, as well as an audio interview with Sites.  The interview begins with a discussion of the reasons the US military declined to prosecute the Marine who shot the unarmed wounded Iraqi on tape.

Four other unarmed wounded Iraqis were executed in that mosque as well by Marines who arrived at the mosque just before the squad with which Sites was embedded arrived.  You hear Sites' Marines ask, "Anyone in there?  You shoot 'em?  Were they armed?" 

According to Sites, the five living Iraqis, along with ten corpses,had been left in the mosque the day before after having been treated for their injuries and disarmed.  Sites entered the mosque and saw the Iraqis they had treated the day before lying on the floor bleeding to death.  The two bodies you see in the foreground of Sites' video are two of these Iraqis.  As Sites filmed the two dying Iraqis, the next extraordinary scene unfolds.  A Marine walks over to two other dying Iraqis and realizes one isn't dead yet.  After shouts that the man is "playing dead" and "fucking faking it" he splatters the man's brains against the wall with a shot from his weapon. Another Marine deapans, "Dead now."

The most interesting part of the interview is Sites' account of his situation once the tape had been made, both with regard to his relationship with the Marines and NBC as well as the vicious reaction from the "patriots" back in the US.  For a sampling of the warbot hysteria we blogged about at the time, see here and here.

Via Dan Gilmore and Boing Boing.

Monday, May 09, 2005

Let the Purge Begin, Part II

Abu Jaafar pulls out one of the dozens of files piled on his desk and leafs through evidence that a Finance Ministry employee once served in Saddam Hussein's notorious intelligence agency. Snapping the file shut, he pronounces his verdict: "This man should be fired."

The office in charge of removing senior members of Saddam's Baath party from state institutions has kicked back into gear under the new government made up largely of Shiite Arabs and Kurds, who were savagely repressed by the former regime.

Should you be wondering what "files" Abu Jaafar is leafing through, I have an idea.  Jon Lee Anderson wrote in the New Yorker, 11-15-2004:

This summer, I visited the Supreme National Commission for De-Baathification, which occupied two floors of a concrete office block inside the Green Zone. A poster on one wall bore the simple message “Baathists=Nazis.” The director of the commission, Mithal al-Alusi, is a tall, lanky man of fifty-three who speaks English with a syrupy drawl and, even in the office, wears a pistol tucked into his belt.

Alusi is a protégé of Ahmad Chalabi, the leader of the Iraqi National Congress, the exile group favored by the Pentagon before the war. Chalabi had been appointed chairman of the commission in September, 2003. Since then, he had lost much of his influence, in part because intelligence concerning Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction, which he promoted, had proved useless. In June, when sovereignty was transferred to Iyad Allawi, a rival of Chalabi’s with ties to the C.I.A., not a single member of the I.N.C. was given a post in the new government. But Chalabi’s access to the de-Baathification commission—and to the files of thousands of Baathists—gave him continued leverage. (When I saw Chalabi in Iraq this summer, he pulled out the intelligence dossier of a senior member of Allawi’s government and translated what he claimed was damaging information about him.)

And, you may remember Chalabi's fall from favor with the neocons.  Elizabeth Sullivan reported in the Cleveland Plain Dealer May 23, 2004: 

Chalabishatteredglass300_1 Last week's raid of Chalabi's ornate dwellings once the property of Saddam Hussein's feared Mukhabarat intelligence agency was the latest sign that America called it wrong on virtually every aspect of its Iraq adventure. And it did so thanks in no small part to the White House's stubborn belief in the pampered, prickly Chalabi, an Iraqi exile since age 13.

Why else would the Pentagon have flown the former London banker and his hand-picked (and U.S. taxpayer-supported) army of 900 loyalists into Nasiriyah before the smoke had even cleared on last year's Iraq invasion? Chalabi's armed gang was being given the green light to expand its reach and power.

Why else would Chalabi loyalists have been allowed to seize truckloads of secret Mukhabarat files in the early days after Saddam's fall, and then demand $350,000 a month from the Pentagon for the privilege of access to documents that weren't theirs to begin with? Chalabi reportedly has used some of the files to try to blackmail former Baath Party members.

Why else would Chalabi be named head of the coalition's "de-Baathification" efforts, giving him tremendous power to name winners and losers in the new Iraq? His virulent anti-Baathist feelings help explain some of the coalition's most misguided early moves, including the disbanding of the Iraqi army.

Those files were the otherwise-objectionable Chalabi's ticket to acceptance  by Jafaari's ruling Shiite coalition, and probably largely why they tolerated him. 

Sunday, May 08, 2005

"Intelligence" leads Marines into a trap?

This report of a botched raid is so bizarre that I had to read it repeatedly while trying to piece together the information it contains.  So, let's see.  We read that, operating on the theory that "foreign fighters" are "flowing into Iraq" from Syria, 1,000 Marines are sent "north of the Euphrates" on what James Janega, reporting for the Chicago Tribune calls "Sunday's elaborate mission, planned for weeks."

However, "a combination of bad luck and insurgent counterattacks quickly disrupted the plan."  The plan was to send  the Army's 814th Multi-Role Bridge Company ahead to build a pontoon bridge across the Euphrates.  But! "The trucks were forced to use their headlights to allow them to spot land mines along the route."

There were landmines in the road?  OK, so this landmine problem forced the convoy to employ the "routine safety practice" of turning on their headlights.  Everything went downhill from there. 

But the routine safety practice apparently alerted area residents to the convoy's presence. An entire town along the route switched off its lights all at once, a move Marines believe is used to send signals from one river town to the next.

As the bridging unit approached the river crossing early Sunday, they switched off the truck headlights even though many soldiers lacked night-vision goggles. In the gloom, one truck rolled off the road and into a ditch, bringing the column to a dead halt in the darkness.

The soldiers soon discovered another problem: The river banks, sodden after recent rains, might have been too wet to support the oncoming American tanks.

"I hope security keeps us safe all day," Capt. Chris Taylor of the 814th said as officers tried to find other ways to get troops and equipment across the river.

But when dawn broke, the column came under mortar fire from Ubaydi, the nearest town. Two mortars dropped within feet of the Marines' command post and an officer's Humvee. The insurgents the Marines expected to find north of the river were on the south side as well.

Marines and soldiers scrambled into a ramshackle building on a bluff overlooking the river, then devised a new strategy: They would not cross the river Sunday. They would attack Ubaydi.

Apart from the information that the area is so hostile that before the Marines even got to the river, they came under attack from the locals, causing the Marines to call in F/A-18 fighter planes and helicopter gunships we have another amazing revelation about why they had blundered into this situation in the first place.

While some American units were able to conduct limited raids north of the Euphrates on Sunday, most of the rest were trapped south of the river while Army engineers struggled to build a pontoon bridge across it. U.S. military officials in Baghdad said forces that crossed the Euphrates had killed six insurgents and captured 54 more, using information gleaned from a captured aide to terrorist leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.

Well, no wonder there were landmines in the road.

Meanwhile, Maj. Steve Lawson of the 3rd Battalion, 25th Marines led his troops through the north end of Ubaydi in tough fighting that lasted until after sunset. Marine officers would not release casualty information, saying their policy requires families to be notified first. But during the day, evacuation helicopters swooped repeatedly to the emergency landing zone set up near the intended river crossing. "We thought the enemy was north of the river," Lawson said. "Obviously, they were here too."

Yeah, obviously they were.  Almost like they knew the Marines were coming.

Winning the War on Terror!

Al Qaeda Kingpin Captured!

Iraq Parliament Approves Cabinet, Government Formed!

There must be something.  Wait!!

Iraqimayhem_may8

Wednesday, May 04, 2005

Fallujah Mosque shooting revelation

I really can't think of anything to say about this that I haven't said before.    The only thing I can point out is that apparently four unarmed, wounded people were executed rather than the one we saw on the tape.
Fallujahroad

The U.S. military has cleared a Marine who shot three unarmed insurgents in a mosque at the height of fighting in Fallujah, Iraq, in November, NBC News reported Wednesday.

  Marine commander Lt. Gen. John Sattler has ruled the soldier involved fired his weapon in self-defense - and no charges will be filed against him, according to NBC.

  The shootings occurred at a mosque during an intense street-to-street battle for Fallujah. Caught on tape by an NBC camera, a squad of Marines entered the mosque to investigate reports of enemy gunfire. Inside, they found four enemy insurgents, wounded in a firefight the day before.

  A Marine corporal who noticed one of the insurgents was still breathing raised his rifle and fired a single shot into the man's head. Military officials now report that same corporal shot three of the unarmed insurgents inside the mosque, NBC reported.

  But after an exhaustive five-month investigation, Sattler ruled the Marine had fired his weapon in self-defense, the network said.

  Sources told NBC News the decision was based on the fact the Marines had been warned that the enemy would feign death and booby-trap bodies as a tactic to lure Marines to their deaths. The sources said the corporal apparently feared for his life when he fired the shots.

  NBC added that the investigation is not over. At least one other Marine remains under investigation for shooting a fourth unarmed insurgent in that same mosque.

                                               

Maybe this will help.

For public consumption, U.S. military officers – like their civilian   bosses and American journalists – usually discuss this war in secular,   even antiseptic terms. When the Times quoted Marine battalion commander   Gary Brandl in another front-page story, on Nov. 6, the lieutenant colonel sounded   straightforward: "We are going to rid the city of insurgents. If they do   fight, we will kill them."

However, on the same day, the Associated Press reported that the   same Lt. Col. Brandl said: "The enemy has got a face. He's called Satan.   He's in Fallujah, and we're going to destroy him."

That statement by Brandl – an officer with 800 soldiers under his   command – caused a bit of stir in some Internet circles. But mainstream   U.S. media outlets scarcely noted his holy-warrior declaration. Most news   outlets ignored it entirely.

Providing a fuller, more revealing quote from Lt. Col. Brandl, the Sunday   Times of London included a lead-in sentence: "The Marines that I have   had wounded over the past five months have been attacked by a faceless enemy.   But the enemy has got a face. He's called Satan...." In other words, Satan   started this conflict. And we – the anti-Satan forces – fully intend   to finish it by destroying him.

Sounds very fundamentalist.

Sounds a lot like Osama bin Laden.

Tuesday, May 03, 2005

The Real Marla Ruzicka

Here's an antidote to the putrid stench emanating from Horowitzian insanity, for everyone who followed Matt's link....

Marla_in_baghdad

Chris Albritton: "Getty photographer Chris Hondros,
Marla Ruzicka and me in Baghdad last summer."

Thanks, Chris. 

Chalabi stuck with Curveball

Ahmad Chalabi, the newly ordained Minister of Iraqi Oil, takes time out of his busy pandering and grifting schedule to whine about an article written in last August's Columbia Journalism Review.  Apparently being associated with "Curveball" is too much, even for a Hero in Error.

Monday, May 02, 2005

Napalm, Death Squads and Life-saving Carrots

I haven't done this in some time, so here's a mini-blog tour:

An interesting post on the use of napalm in Iraq by lenin. Added bonus: proof once again that Ann Clwyd is a pathetic tool of the state.

Special Police Commandos militia=Death Squads? swopa thinks so. Helena Cobban sees the same similarities.

And Riverbend explains how in "liberated Iraq" carrots can save a life.

Sunday, May 01, 2005

Read the unredacted Sgrena shooting report

This time it's the US military wielding the black marker in the Sgrena shooting report. Fortunately for fans of complete, unredacted reports, it's far less effective to black out text distributed on a PDF file than it is to black out faces of honor guard soldiers.Sgrena_report


Kevin Drum explains how to read the whole report and shows how ridiculous the redactions were in the first place.

For example, the name of the third person in the car is Andrea Carpani. Was there any reason to keep this a secret? Beats me. But they didn't do a very good job of it.

Another section describes the methods used by insurgents to place bombs along "Route Irish," the road to the Baghdad airport, including: positioning explosives alongside guard rails, staging equipment in vehicles or near overpasses, wrapping explosives in brown paper bags, using timers, etc. I can't imagine that this stuff is even remotely worth classifying, since these techniques are obvious to anyone who thinks about how to place explosives for more than a minute or two, but for some reason they were redacted.

I may go through the report later to see if anything more interesting was redacted, but for now I just wanted to let enterprising journalists know that the full report is available to anyone with a copy of Acrobat Reader. Go to it, guys!

In other news, the US admits there were "flaws" in the procedures that resulted in the shooting of Calipari that night. Though the Italians disagree with the report released by the US clearing the soldiers involved in the shooting incident, they'd likely agree with the "flawed procedures" admission.

My Photo

I also post at


Ron Paul on Technorati

LewRockwell Blog

  • Add to Google

newsvine ron paul

Recent Posts

Blog Roll I

Blog stuff