peaceblogs


advertising

Newsvine poll

Demand Ron Paul

Bloglines

Firefox


  • Get Firefox!

google


  • Google


  • Search WWW
    Search UnFairWitness

BlogAds

blogads advertising

Abu Ghraib Torture Photos

  • Ag15
    The photos America doesn't want seen MORE photographs have been leaked of Iraqi citizens tortured by US soldiers at the notorious Abu Ghraib prison on the outskirts of Baghdad. Tonight the SBS Dateline program plans to broadcast about 60 previously unpublished photographs that the US Government has been fighting to keep secret in a court case with the American Civil Liberties Union. Although a US judge last year granted the union access to the photographs following a freedom-of-information request, the US Administration has appealed against the decision on the grounds their release would fuel anti-American sentiment. Some of the photos are similar to those published in 2004, others are different. They include photographs of six corpses, although the circumstances of their deaths are not clear. There are also pictures of what appear to be burns and wounds from shotgun pellets. The executive producer of Dateline, Mike Carey, said he was showing the pictures leaked to his program because it was important people understood what had happened at Abu Ghraib. Seven US guards were jailed following publication of the first batch of Abu Ghraib photographs in April 2004. Mr Carey said he could not explain why the photographs had not yet been published, as he thought it was likely that some journalists had them. "It think it's strange, maybe they think its more of the same."
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 03/2004

« October 2004 | Main | December 2004 »

Tuesday, November 30, 2004

Purple Pretzel Picnic for Dubya

Canadians in New Brunswick are having a pretzels and beer picnic in honor of Emperor Junior's visit to Ottawa.

Monday, November 29, 2004

Comical Allawi, the new Baghdad Bob


Baghdad_bob
"The level of criminal operations has receded and is continuing to drop following the operation in Fallujah," Comical Allawi said on the state-owned Iraqiya television, in response to questions from viewers.

"The cleansing in Fallujah of terrorist elements is continuing and we are preparing for the residents to return to their city," he added.


Comical Allawi announced today that violence is decreasing.
  • Attacks have increased against U.S., Iraqi and other targets on the road leading from the center of Baghdad to the city's international airport, located on the western outskirts of the capital.

    The British Embassy announced Monday that its staff would no longer be permitted to travel on the airport road, which the U.S. State Department has identified as one of the most dangerous routes in Iraq.

  • South of the capital, U.S., British and Iraqi forces pressed an offensive aimed at clearing insurgents from an area known as the "triangle of death." Two Marines were killed there Sunday, U.S. officials said, and British troops escaped serious injury Monday when a bomb exploded next to a Scimitar light tank from the Queen's Dragoon Guards.
  • The Pentagon said Monday the U.S. military death toll in Iraq stands at 1,251, up by 21 since the last reported toll released Nov. 24. That means at least 130 U.S. troops have died in Iraq this month. The deadliest month for U.S. troops in Iraq was last April, when 135 died.
  • In Geneva, the international Red Cross said Iraq's Red Crescent had set up a relief center in Fallujah to aid civilians, but doctors and nurses have been unable to treat the wounded because of continued fighting between U.S.-led forces and insurgents.

    "There are many civilians who are still trapped in the city and don't dare to come to the Red Crescent office," said Rana Sidani of the International Committee of the Red Cross.

    She said there was a shortage of drinking water in Fallujah and the city water purification station was not working "because there is nonstop fighting around it."

  • At least 50 people have been killed in Mosul in the past 10 days -- most of them believed to have been supporters of Iraq's interim government or members of its security forces.
  • In addition, two U.S. Marines were killed in a weekend bombing south of the capital, a U.S. official said Monday. U.S., British and Iraqi forces have been sweeping through the area to clear Sunni insurgents from a string of towns and cities between Baghdad and the Shiite shrine cities of Najaf and Karbala.
  • Insurgents stepped up attacks on Iraq's fledgling security forces, killing seven Iraqi police and guardsmen Monday in a suicide bombing hours after storming a police station north of the capital. Two U.S. soldiers died in a bombing in Baghdad.
  • A US military spokesman also reported that 13 marines and two civilians were wounded Monday when mortar shells struck a military base south of Baghdad

The US out of Iraq: possible scenarios

Matt Yglesias sort of stakes out a spot in the When Will The US Leave Iraq betting pool.

I think we ought to start getting out very quickly after the January elections (it will take some time to count the results, put the new government in place, and work out something orderly, but I have in mind something in the vein of late-February early-March for the beginning of a pullout) a view that, I suspect, will be denounced as cowardly defeatism. If Bush starts pulling troops out in late February or early March (which I think is certainly possible) this will be lauded as a brilliant victory for American arms. Such is life.
Of course, the US ought not be in Iraq in the first place and while they indeed ought to leave ASAP, there is no evidence that they will. Leaving post-election is an outside possibility, but it assumes that the US will accept a Shi`a Islamic theocracy in Iraq, which they will not unless they are faced with a Saigon Moment which leaves them no choice.

I think there will be no elections in January and the US Bushies know this very well. Only the Kurds and Shi`a are in a position to even register voters at this time and whatever they're doing about it they're doing with very little to no help. How can you have national elections when people in the capital can't even vote?

Remember, these elections are supposed to elect an assembly which is then supposed to pick a PM and write a constitution, so actually carrying out some sort of vote would be only the beginning of the battle. Keep in mind the high drama surrounding the adoption of the CPA's TAL last spring and imagine even more of the same amidst escalating bombings, assassinations, kidnappings, sabotage and gunbattles because, face it, the resistance isn't going away. Just wait til people actually get to see Fallujah. Does anyone think the US would leave during all this, really?

I think what is happening is loud lip service for elections from Bush and the Puppets to keep the Shi`a quiet while the US "crushes" the Sunni resistance and builds up troop numbers, ostensibly for the elections. Then the Shi`a will have their turn to be crushed when they rise up in outrage over the cancelled elections. The Bushies are betting that they'll have the Sunni Arabs beaten into submission by this time so they'll be able to turn their entire attention to the Shi`a. Meantime, the Kurds with their 60,000 strong peshmerga militia and exile pet Iraqis like Allawi will help their good American buddies stomp the Iraqi Arabs into democracy American-style, complete with 14 bases, a SOFA agreement and a launch pad from which to hit Iran, each for their own reasons. I'm not saying they're going to be successful in this because I don't think they will ever beat the Arab Sunnis into submission, just for starters. Exhibit A: they're still in Fallujah bombing the rubble and getting shot at while car bombs go off in Ramadi and Baghdad, the Green Zone is being mortared and rocketed day and night and beheaded and mutilated corpses of the ING and Iraqi police are harvested from the streets of Mosul daily.

Bottom line: When the US Allawi announces the inevitable cancelled elections, the Shi`a will open a southern front of the resistance. Saigon Moment: Late May or June.

OK, tell me why I'm wrong and what your scenarios are.

Sunday, November 28, 2004

Yushchenko's weird skin condition

Check out Flit on Yushchenko's skin problem. He quotes a dermatologist:

"Viktor Yushchenko probably has one of two possible medical conditions that would account for his rapid facial changes. The diseases are scleromyxedema or cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. He needs a skin biopsy. I cannot conceive how poisoning could cause these changes."

--Howard Bargman, MD, associate professor of dermatology, University of Toronto

Makes sense, doesn't it?

A "Free Barghouti" campaign?

Some interesting information is coming out on the Palestinian elections in the wake of Marwan Barghouti withdrawing his bid for the PA presidency. Andrew Schamess has this intriguing bit:

On Thursday, Barghouti made a suprise announcement that he would run an independent campaign for President. This threw everybody into a tizzy until he called it off late Thursday night. The best report on this, I thought, was on National Public Radio. The trade-off, it appears, was that Fatah will hold new elections for its ruling Revolutionary Council, for the first time in fifteen years. This will certainly give the younger generation greater power in the organization.

What will this mean for Palestinian policies? Firstly, the younger generation has pressed for more efficient government and an end to patronage and corruption in the Palestinian Authority. Secondly, those raised on armed struggle against an oppressive regime are not likely to lay down their arms and accept whatever compromise suits Israel's purposes. As Barghouti put it, he stands for resistance and negotiation; Abbas for negotiation without resistance. A third possible consequence, if Barghouti and his constituents are successful, is that a reinvigorated Fatah will regain its credibility among disaffected Palestinians who have gravitated toward Hamas in the past decade.

As for Hamas, Helena Cobban has translated a piece Saida Hamad in East Jerusalem wrote for Hayat which seems to indicate that Hamas may negotiate some quid pro quo on elections at the local level in return for not opposing Abu Mazen, which strategy has been effective for Hizbullah in Lebanon. Read the rest of Helena's piece for more detail on the possibility of a "Free Barghouti" campaign being part Barghouti's price for refraining from running for PA president. As for the other likely price, how about Vice President Barghouti on the Fatah ticket?
The info about the possible "Free Barghouthi" campaign. As you can see from the translation I provided, the "old guard" guys in Fateh reportedly promised this to Marwan as part of the quid pro quo they offered him in return for him agreeing not only not stand against Abu Mazen in the January elections, but also (gulp), actually to support him... The other parts of the quid pro quo were: (a ) A commitment to hold the 16th meeting of Fateh's policymaking General Conference no later than August, so that both the Central Committee and (I assume) the Revolutionary Council can be renewed there through democratic means... (In contrast to much past practice.) Plus (b) the possibility that in connection with the "Free Barghouthi" campaign, Abu Mazen would name Marwan as his "Vice Presidential" candidate in the PA election...So far, it looks as though Marwan drove a pretty hard bargain...

Friday, November 26, 2004

It's the policy, stupid!

A report delivered by the Defense Science Board, an advisory committee to the US Defense Department, to the Office of the Secretary of Defense around the end of September has gotten very little media attention, maybe because, as Tom Shanker of the NYT writes,

A harshly critical report by a Pentagon advisory panel says the United States is failing in its efforts to explain the nation's diplomatic and military actions to the Muslim world, but it warns that no public relations plan or information operation can defend America from flawed policies.
Which rather sums up a point Michael Scheuer's Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror makes repeatedly. Of course the Bush administration didn't listen to him and just to prove they won't get the point of this report either, Larry Di Rita made this comment on behalf of the Pentagon:
"We're wrestling with this," Mr. Di Rita said. "But it doesn't change the underlying principle, at least with respect to the Department of Defense. Our job is to put out information to the public that is accurate, and to put it out as quickly as we can."
The 102-page report is online here (PDF). I haven't had any luck with the link, but happily, Helena Cobban has heavily excerpted the paper on her blog. Here are a couple of gems to show why it bounced off the stony skulls of the Bushies:
  • Strategic communication [to be effective, will] ... build on indepth knowledge of other cultures and factors that motivate human behavior. It will adapt techniques of skillful political campaigning, even as it avoids slogans, quick fixes, and mind sets of winners and losers. It will search out credible messengers and create message authority. It will seek to persuade within news cycles, weeks, and months. It will engage in a respectful dialogue of ideas that begins with listening and assumes decades of sustained effort.
  • But opinions must be taken into account when policy options are considered and implemented. At a minimum, we should not be surprised by public reactions to policy choices. Policies will not succeed unless they are communicated to global and domestic audiences in ways that are credible and allow them to make informed, independent judgments. Words in tone and substance should avoid offence where possible; messages should seek to reduce, not increase, perceptions of arrogance, opportunism, and double standards.

Listening?? Avoid offence?? Isn't that a little too....French? But, wait. It gets worse....
American direct intervention in the Muslim World has paradoxically elevated the stature of and support for radical Islamists, while diminishing support for the United States to single-digits in some Arab societies.

  • Muslims do not “hate our freedom,” but rather, they hate our policies.[HC emphasis] The overwhelming majority voice their objections to what they see as one-sided support in favor of Israel and against Palestinian rights, and the longstanding, even increasing support for what Muslims collectively see as tyrannies, most notably Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Pakistan, and the Gulf states.

  • Thus when American public diplomacy talks about bringing democracy to Islamic societies, this is seen as no more than self-serving hypocrisy. Moreover, saying that “freedom is the future of the Middle East” is seen as patronizing, suggesting that Arabs are like the enslaved peoples of the old Communist World — but Muslims do not feel this way: they feel oppressed, but not enslaved.

  • Furthermore, in the eyes of Muslims, American occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq has not led to democracy there, but only more chaos and suffering. U.S. actions appear in contrast to be motivated by ulterior motives, and deliberately controlled in order to best serve American national interests at the expense of truly Muslim selfdetermination.
  • [...]
  • Finally, Muslims see Americans as strangely narcissistic — namely, that the war is all about us. As the Muslims see it, everything about the war is — for Americans — really no more than an extension of American domestic politics and its great game. This perception is of course necessarily heightened by election-year atmospherics, but nonetheless sustains their impression that when Americans talk to Muslims they arereally just talking to themselves.

Thus the critical problem in American public diplomacy directed toward the Muslim World is not one of “dissemination of information,” or even one of crafting and delivering the “right” message. Rather, it is a fundamental problem of credibility. Simply, there is none — the United States today is without a working channel of communication to the world of Muslims and of Islam. Inevitably therefore, whatever Americans do and say only serves the party that has both the message and the “loud and clear” channel: the enemy.
And this, Helena says, is repeated throughout the report:In other words, they do not hate us for our values, but because of our policies.

But then an administration that thought a pre-9/11 briefing titled Bin Laden Determined To Strike in US was a "historical document" will likely think this report should go in the bin with other such famously ignored reports as The Future of Iraq project and Joe Wilson's report on Niger yellowcake.

Dead Bodies in Mosul

MOSUL, IRAQ: An Iraqi man stands next to three unidentified bodies with a yellow note placed in the mouth of one of the bodies accusing them of being Kurdish peshmerga fighters, in Mosul, 370 kms north of Baghdad, 21 November 2004. (UJAHED MOHAMMED/AFP/Getty Images)
MOSUL, IRAQ: An Iraqi man stands next to three unidentified bodies with a yellow note placed in the mouth of one of the bodies accusing them of being Kurdish peshmerga fighters, in Mosul, 370 kms north of Baghdad, 21 November 2004. (UJAHED MOHAMMED/AFP/Getty Images)

Well, the sun's been down for 3 hours in Baghdad now, so this should be the final Dead Body in Mosul tally for Friday: 21. Total number of bodies found in the last week: 41. (Correction: 21 appears to be the number for Thursday and Friday combined.)

The picture on the left, showing bodies found November 21, is graphic. Click the thumbnail to enlarge.

Iraq in Pictures has more photos.

UPDATE: Iraq in Pictures has today's photos up from Mosul.











Thursday, November 25, 2004

Car bombs? Look, Zarqawi! Anthrax! Chemicals!

Zarqawi aide arrested in Mosul! Really! Just because Iraqi Minister of State Qassim Dawoud was full of merde when he announced the capture of Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri, doesn't mean he's always wrong. Right?

Iraqi security adviser Kassim Daoud told a news conference Iraqi national guard soldiers had found a chemical laboratory in the former rebel stronghold of Falluja that was used to "prepare deadly explosives and poisons", although US Marines in the city were sceptical evidence of the manufacture of chemical weapons had been found.

"They also found in the lab booklets and instructions on how to make bombs and poisons. They even talked about the production of anthrax," Mr Daoud said.

Mr Daoud also said one of Zarqawi's lieutenants, who he identified only as Abu Saeed, had been captured a few days ago in Mosul.

I don't know why anyone reports this stuff, let alone why it's all over the newswires. You'd think nothing else was going on.

These aren't the droids you're looking for....

Wednesday, November 24, 2004

Compassionate Conservatives

idleworm: Compassionate Conservatives

Iraqi Oil Mayhem

Here are some interesting factoids gleaned from Iraq Pipeline Watch, a website run by the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security which bills itself as "the world's only non-profit public educational organization focusing on energy security."

In 2003, starting June 12, there were 37 attacks on Iraqi pipelines, oil installations, and oil personnel.

In 2004, there have been 163, so far. In November, through today, there have been 24, for an average of one per day. November also marks the first time oil wells have been set afire. There are currently 6 burning, all in the Khubbaz field, west of Kirkuk.

A new resident for the Mukata

The Israeli government appears so eager to facilitate the Palestinians' election of a replacement for Arafat that they're going to allow international election observers into Occupied Palestine. The IDF, however, will not withdraw, so I suppose the observers will be required to sign the Israeli "We have the right to kill you" visa.

Steve Erlanger (NYT/IHT) writes of the international observer concession:

It was another indication that Israel, after the death of Yasser Arafat and under new pressure from the West for movement on the peace process, does not want to be seen as putting obstacles in the way of the Palestinians exercising their right to vote.
Which is ridiculous. Israel and the US have been putting obstacles in the way of the Palestinians exercising their right to vote for many years. Lawrence of Cyberia points out:
Remember that in response to Bush's Rose Garden speech of June 2002, in which he called for the election of a new leadership "not tainted by terror", the PA called President Bush's bluff and scheduled elections for 20 January 2003. But with Arafat riding high in Palestinians public opinion polls after the Muqata siege in fall 2002, it quickly became obvious that if the elections were held, Arafat would be re-elected. And President Bush's new-found commitment to Palestinian democracy died a sudden death. Because let's be honest, this Administration's commitment to bringing "democracy" to the Middle East does not really envisage democracies that vote for anyone other than our preferred candidate. All of which explains why there was a resounding silence from the US when the PA asked for pressure on Israel to allow voter registration to take place in the reoccupied Palestinian cities. Ha'aretz ran a series of articles discussing openly how there was no chance that the Palestinians were going to be allowed to organize elections, if there was any danger that Arafat would get a new mandate, e.g.:
The real reason why the Israeli authorities, with the support of the United States, will not permit Palestinian elections is that they do not want Arafat to be reelected....So the PA can go on making all the preparations and its senior officials can talk as much as they wish about democratic processes and procedures, but as long as it's clear that Arafat will win, elections are not likely to take place.

-- Danny Rubinstein, The Other Elections; (Ha'aretz, 16 Nov 2002).

That was what killed off the 2003 Palestinian elections.
There's more, read the whole thing. Well, it will be interesting to see what happens if the Palestinian people don't elect Mahmoud Abbas, like they're supposed to. Andrew Schamess has more.

American gunned down in Baghdad

Apparently an American State Department official ventured out of the Green Zone in Baghdad today.

U.S. Civilian Official Killed by Gunfire in Baghdad

MEMRI SLAPPs Professor Cole

For anyone interested in the lawsuit threatened by MEMRI against Professor Juan Cole (Repressive MEMRI on AWC frontpage), there's both a well-written comprehensive defense and a set of links to other blogs supporting Cole at Abu Aardvark's place.

In short, if you do decide to take Professor Cole to court over the allegation that you cherry-pick the Arab media to offer a highly warped perspective of Arab discourse, expect to lose. The trial would be exceedingly helpful to the general good of discrediting you by shining light on your translation and selection practices.

Cheerfully yours,
the aardvark

American Amnesia on MEMRI:
MEMRI, the Middle East Media Research Organization, hasn't received attention here at American Amnesia for one simple reason: it's a compost of specious translations of worst-of-the-worst opinion pieces coming out of the Arabic press. Think of an organization dedicated to translating into Arabic the Jerry Falwells, Bob Jones, and other scraps of ideological detritus bobbing around in our local papers, and you've got MEMRI's mission and net worth.

For those that are unfamiliar with MEMRI, it's a group of translators whose work poses as a "bridge" to the language gap between the West and the Middle East. The fact that it bridges something is sufficient for most people without knowledge of the language...never mind where it leads you.

I think Yigal Carmon is going to regret SLAPPing this particular hornet's nest.

Sunday, November 21, 2004

Kevin Sites speaks out

Kevin Sites speaks out: Open Letter to Devil Dogs of the 3.1

To Devil Dogs of the 3.1:

Since the shooting in the Mosque, I've been haunted that I have not been able to tell you directly what I saw or explain the process by which the world came to see it as well. As you know, I'm not some war zone tourist with a camera who doesn't understand that ugly things happen in combat. I've spent most of the last five years covering global conflict. But I have never in my career been a 'gotcha' reporter -- hoping for people to commit wrongdoings so I can catch them at it.

This week I've even been shocked to see myself painted as some kind of anti-war activist. Anyone who has seen my reporting on television or has read the dispatches on this website is fully aware of the lengths I've gone to play it straight down the middle -- not to become a tool of propaganda for the left or the right.

But I find myself a lightning rod for controversy in reporting what I saw occur in front of me, camera rolling.

It's time you to have the facts from me, in my own words, about what I saw -- without imposing on that Marine -- guilt or innocence or anything in between. I want you to read my account and make up your own minds about whether you think what I did was right or wrong. All the other armchair analysts don't mean a damn to me.

Here it goes.

via boing boing

Ramadi Ambush

"We feel right now that we have, as I mentioned, broken the back of the insurgency. We've taken away this safe haven," Lt. Gen. John Sattler told reporters at the Pentagon in a video teleconference from Fallujah.

GUNMEN ambushed a convoy of Iraqi National Guards in Ramadi, killing nine soldiers and wounding 17, local hospital officials said today.

Rocket-wielding guerrillas ordered the men from their vehicles and then gunned them down after holding them up on a main street in broad daylight and forcing them to drive to the outskirts of the city, wounded survivors said.

The attackers then torched the Guards' two trucks.

Mmmmkay, then.

Saturday, November 20, 2004

Axis of Evil dynamics explained

fubar, in a selfless act of public service, has made understanding the Axis of Evil simple with the Needlenose Logic-O-Gram. Check it out.

Friday, November 19, 2004

Wounded Iraqi POWs shot in Fallujah mosque

Because I judge Phil Carter to regularly be both objective and honest, I was somewhat shocked to read in Slate, his accounting of the Fallujah mosque shooting incident. In order to demonstrate where Phil goes wrong, I'm going to use Helena Cobbam's examination of the incident. All bolding and italics mine.

The timing of the account seems a little internally inconsistent. Sites' description of, apparently, the first time the battalion stormed the mosque was that it was on "Saturday", but later it seems more likely that it was on Friday... Maybe late-night Friday / early-morning Sat?

Anyway, that was when they left five wounded insurgents behind them inside the mosque, with no record that any first-aid had been offered to them. A violation of the Geneva Conventions. (Or, two violations.)

The marines also "displayed" the arms they'd found in the mosque at the time, which meant that the arms were in the Marines' hands, not those of the insurgents. Almost certainly, the wounded insurgents were disarmed at that time. They were also apparently immobile, since they were simply "left behind in the mosque for other Marines to evacuate for treatment".

No such evacuation occurred, however. (Did the attacking squad call in to the medics to make such an evacuation? That wd be crucial evidence of their intent.)

On Saturday, two units that "were not involved in Friday’s fighting" returned to the mosque, approaching it from two different sides. Sites was, obviously, traveling with only one of the two units and apparently could not see what the other unit was doing. He said he could hear gunfire from inside. He heard a Marine confirm that he had shot the people inside the mosque:

“Did you shoot them?” the lieutenant asked.

“Roger that, sir,” the second Marine replied.

“Were they armed?” the lieutenant asked.

The second Marine shrugged in reply.

I take it that's a "No."

When Sites entered the mosque, he saw the five people he'd seen left there the day before, and four of them "had been shot again, apparently by members of the squad that entered the mosque moments earlier." He didn't report seeing any other Iraqis in the mosque (such as might have been armed and shot at the squad that entered.)

In other words, four of the five wounded insurgents who'd been left there the day before, presumably already disarmed, immobile, and "awaiating medical evacuation", had been summarily shot.

Four massive violations of the GC's.

And then, Sites saw one Marine shoot one of the wounded men in cold blood. (Which is what we saw on the t.v. clip.)

Another violation of the GC's. Possibly, the seventh such violation that Sites had talked about in his testimony so far.

Someone--presumably Sites-- then told the shooter that his mvictim had been a wounded prisoner, and the Marine told Sites: “I didn’t know, sir. I didn’t know.”

So, huge numbers of violations there need to be investigated, and it seems clear it is not only the one shooter whom Sites had caught on tape whose actions should be investigated.

I want to express a massive thank-you to Kevin Sites for having stuck closely to journalistic and humanitarian ethics in this whole incident. I am sure that, for journalists who are embedded with fighting formations in circumstances that for all of them are very scary, there is a huge temptation to ignore or downplay the "excesses" that the embedded-in units might commit "in the heat of battle". Sites resisted that temptation.

In addition, he knew enough about the distinctions contained in the Geneva Conventions that he could clearly recognize that the wounded insurgents did indeed qualify as wounded POWs (since they had previously been disarmed by the US forces, and the original capturing unit had asserted the US forces' responsibility for them by promising a medical evacuation for them), and therefore that shooting them was an act for which the shooter should be reproached. Indeed, shooting them was a clear war crime.

So, Kevin: big thanks to you.

And the rest of us: let's figure out what we can do to get humanitarian access into Fallujah and the other beleaguered cities absolutely as soon as possible.

Phil, do you see why this is wrong, now?
If prosecutors charge the Marine with murder, they will argue that the Marines took these Iraqi men as prisoners the moment they secured the building. Moving or not, the wounded Iraqi was a prisoner....
The Iraqis were prisoners from the day before. They were taken prisoner and disarmed by another group of Marines and then left, wounded and bleeding.

I'm curious as to how the accounting by Kevin Sites got so garbled, to the point I'm getting numerous emails demonstrating the same error. I know the real story isn't pleasant, but I don't believe Phil Carter would write the article he did unless he had been convinced by someone credible that the story was as he related it. Unfortunately, it isn't.

What's wrong with this picture?




An Iraqi woman passes a U.S. soldier taking cover after troops came under fire in Baghdad, Iraq, following an incident along Baghdad's airport road.
An Iraqi woman passes a U.S. soldier taking cover
after troops came under fire in Baghdad, Iraq, following an incident
along Baghdad's airport road.

Hadi Mizban / the Associated Press


Drums of War déjà vu

Here we go again

Secretary of State Colin L. Powell shared information with reporters Wednesday about Iran's nuclear program that was classified and based on an unvetted, single source who provided information that two U.S. officials said yesterday was highly significant if true but has not yet been verified. [...] According to one official with access to the material, a "walk-in" source approached U.S intelligence earlier this month with more than 1,000 pages purported to be Iranian drawings and technical documents, including a nuclear warhead design and modifications to enable Iranian ballistic missiles to deliver an atomic strike. The official agreed to discuss the information on the condition of anonymity and only because Powell had alluded to it publicly.
The London Times quotes Powell:
"You do not have a weapon until you put it in something that can deliver a weapon," Mr Powell said.

Iraqidronesofdeath

Like the Iraqi Drones of Death, for example.

New US Government Symbols

Quiddity has designed a new seal for the Department of Justice in honor of Alberto "The Geneva Convention is obsolete" Gonzales:

Uggabuggadojseal


Translation

See also the new CIA seal honoring Porter "The Purge" Goss.

McCain acknowledges US War Crime

McCain acknowledges that the Marine who shot the unarmed wounded Iraqi in a Fallujah mosque committed a war crime.

Well, isn't that the logical conclusion? Why else be angry that the film is being aired? Either what that Marine did is OK or it isn't. If it's OK, why would you care that the footage is being broadcast?

Thursday, November 18, 2004

Arab Media Review

Review of Arab media for Thursday, November 18:


Mosque_shooting

via Abu Aardvark

For an idea of how revolting this scene was to Iraqis, see Riverbend.

Palestine: Dying to Live

Freepalestine_1


Israel apologizes for not killing Palestinians

Three Palestinians were killed by the Israeli Army last night in Gaza.

Oh, wait! They weren't Palestinians! They were Egyptian policemen! Oops!

If you ever wondered what an actual Israeli apology looked like, now one actually exists:

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon telephoned Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak to express regret over the incident, which could derail the Egyptian foreign minister's first visit to the Jewish state next week to discuss a planned Israeli pullout from Gaza.

Sharon promised a full investigation and to share findings with the Egyptians. Israeli military officials said soldiers had mistaken the Egyptian policemen for Palestinian militants and thought they were planting explosives against Israeli forces.

"From the bottom of our hearts, we are sorry," Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Ehud Olmert told reporters.

In light of that example, it's interesting to revisit some Gaza killings the Israelis weren't sorry about, like British cameraman James Miller who was shot by an IDF sniper, American peace activist Rachel Corrie who was crushed by an IDF armored D9 military bulldozer, and British peace activist Tom Hurndall, shot by the IDF while trying to get Palestinian children to safety. None of these deaths were worthy of an Israeli apology. Oh, and all those dead Palestinians? They aren't even sorry for shooting little girls and boys.

Wednesday, November 17, 2004

Smearing Kevin Sites

Warfloggers are busy shooting the messenger. Poor Kevin Sites. All his war reporting in Kosovo and Afghanistan and Iraq, and the fact that he's embedded in the most dangerous place in Iraq isn't enough to save him from Republicans on Auto Smear. As with the Abu Ghraib torture photos, the problem for the pro-war With Us Or Against Us crowd isn't the act that horrifies the world, it's the fact that the pictures came out.

I guess InstaWarPundit won't be recommending Kevin Sites anymore.

Unedited video: Fallujah Mosque Shooting

Putting Humpty Dumpty together again

According to reports trickling out of the US military command in Iraq, the US military is planning to redecorate Fallujah with those ornaments beloved of statists everywhere "a new government, including a new mayor, police chief and thousands of police." The attitude seems to be that now that they've either run everyone out of the town, killed those who stayed, and destroyed most of the buildings and homes they own it all because there's no indication that any Fallujans are being consulted about any of this.

Some U.S. commanders in Iraq are worried that Fallujah could become a shrine to Iraqi suffering and dead Muslim warriors.

Before last week's military assault, the city was a bastion of the resistance. U.S. and Iraqi forces have regained control but don't claim to have stamped out the rebellion. One military official says it could end up with the same unsettled problems plaguing Baghdad.

So, as soon as the city settles down, U.S. and Iraqi officials plan to bring in a new government, including a new mayor, police chief and thousands of police. Shortly after, contractors plan to launch nearly 180-million dollars in repairs to the trashed city.

A Marine planner says U.S. forces knew the "could easily dominate" combat in Fallujah, but "Now is when the real work begins."

In his words, "We're going to make sure Fallujah is done right."

I guess the Iraqis who lived in Fallujah aren't going to have any say in whether or not the arsonist who burns your house down should be hired to rebuild it. Suppose the ones still shooting at the victorious invaders in Fallujah are the ones who don't like The Plan?

UPDATE: Well, I guess this will all have to wait anyhow:

In Fallujah, heavy machine-gun fire and explosions rang out in south-central parts of Fallujah as U.S. Marines hunted fighters still in the turbulent city. In the northern Jolan neighborhood, U.S. Marines fought insurgents who officers said had sneaked back into the city by swimming across the Euphrates River.
I thought Fallujah was "sealed off."

Tuesday, November 16, 2004

Today in Iraq: Two videotaped killings

  1. Margaret Hassan is shown kneeling, blindfolded wearing an orange jumpsuit. She is shot in the head. No group has claimed responsibility for her kidnapping or murder.
  2. For the second day, a wounded Iraqi described as an "old man" lies slumped against the wall of a mosque in Fallujah, along with four other Iraqi wounded. A US Marine sees him still breathing and shoots him in the head. Link here to the uncensored video.

Submit or Die

Uskillers

"This exemplifies the horrors of war," said Marine Capt. P.J. Batty, from Park City, Utah, of the body pickup. "We don't wish this upon anyone, but everyone needs to understand there are consequences for not following the Iraqi government."

Monday, November 15, 2004

Fallujah: Hearts and Minds, Take 2

Now that Fallujah is smashed into heaps of smoking corpse-strewn rubble, the US Military is gearing up for what they call the "next battle" - the battle for "hearts and minds." The Civilians that famously didn't exist yesterday are now expected to come to a food and medical distribution center run by their liberators:

But Monday the mosque became a food and medical distribution center - the first tentative step by US and Iraqi forces to move this broken ghost town from war to peace.

Some 88 families sent men on foot to collect food and water, handed out by Iraqi National Guard units after US civil affairs teams broadcast news of the distribution.

The danger of the rebels remains: One man was carried dead to the mosque, after being shot while on his way by what his friends described as a foreign insurgent sniper. Elsewhere in Fallujah, a US marine was also killed by a sniper.

"People were so happy [when they came], because they need water and food for so many days," says Dr. Adnan Naji, a medical doctor and captain in the Iraqi armed forces, who set up a clinic inside the mosque Monday that treated nearly 20 cases.

"This is a very important day for us, and for Iraqi and American soldiers, because we let the people go out," says Dr. Naji.

They let the people go out.
Besides the first food and water distributions, which were protected by US forces as Iraqi units gave the handouts, the Imam of the Hadra mosque organized a mix of Iraqi soldiers and civilian men to remove the scores of dead from the streets.
Oh, that's nice.

While this happy scene is playing out in downtown Fallujah, Dahr Jamail reports:

The horrendous humanitarian disaster of Fallujah drags on as the US military continues to refuse the entry of an Iraqi Red Crescent (IRC) convoy of relief supplies. The Red Crescent has appealed to the UN to intervene, but no such luck, nor does the military relent.

IP's, who are under U.S. control, have looted Fallujah General Hospital.

The military stopped the Red Crescent at the gates of the city and are not allowing them in. They allowed some bodies to be buried, but others are being eaten by dogs and cats in the streets, as reported by refugees just out of the city, as well as residents still trapped there.

The military said it saw no need for the IRC to deliver aid to people inside Fallujah because it did not think any civilians were still inside the city.

Contradicting this claim, along with virtually every aid work, refugee, and resident of Fallujah was US Marine Col. Mike Shupp who said, "There is no need to bring [Red Crescent] supplies in because we have supplies of our own for the people."

IRC spokeswoman Firdu al-Ubadi added, "We know of at least 157 families inside Fallujah who need our help."

The hospital in Fallujah stands empty not only because the bridge over the Euphrates was blocked by the US Military until today, but also because every car in Fallujah has been destroyed by the invading Marines for fear of car bombs. Now the trapped civilians of Fallujah are forced to go to their liberators for food, water and medicine which makes one wonder just how much humiliation the military is planning to dish out to win those hearts and minds.

Sunday, November 14, 2004

Let the Red Crescent into Jenin Fallujah

A Red Crescent aid convoy, for some reason, is still sitting at the hospital west of Fallujah. the U.S. military says there's "no need" for them to deliver aid to the people of Fallujah.

He said casualties could now be brought out over the reopened bridge and treated at Falluja's hospital, adding that he had not heard of any civilians trapped inside the city.
Yes, but the hospital is empty. Even taking the highest estimates of the number of Fallujans who are currently refugees leaves tens of thousands still in their homes.
Some residents still inside the city, contacted by Reuters yesterday, said their children were suffering from diarrhoea and had not eaten for days.

Asked what he would do about the families and other non-combatants in the city, Col Shupp said: "I haven't heard that myself and the Iraqi soldiers didn't tell me about that. We want to help them as much as we can. We are on the radio telling them how to come out and how to come up to coalition forces."

How to come out. First there were no civilians trapped in Fallujah, and anyway, if there were, they had food and stuff for them and besides, they're teaching them how to live through coming out of their house. Here's Scott Peterson on how that went for one Iraqi:
US and Iraqi forces have made clear - with leaflet drops, radio broadcasts, and psychological operations teams with loudspeakers mounted on Humvees - that the way to stay alive in Fallujah is to keep indoors, or "surrender" with a white flag.

Mr. Hamid, the frightened, mustachioed Iraqi of military age, followed those instructions when he surrendered.

Besides his white flag, Hamid bore a handwritten letter in English, written by his father, explaining that he had moved the rest of his family out of Fallujah, and left Hamid to "safeguard the house. I hope [you] treat him kindly, if [you] happen to see him."

He also carried a mobile phone, and a card showing him to be a student at the Al-Rasheed College of Engineering and Science. After five or six days, he said, he had run out of food and water. A neighbor also wanted to turn himself in, to be safer.

But until his story was examined in detail, by an interpreter and intelligence officer, Hamid was hardly welcome. He was handcuffed, and put in a room with another detainee, until a US team came 10 hours later to question him.

The intelligence officer who came to interrogate both detainees said that insurgents have been posing as civilians.

A few weeks ago in the town of Khaldiya, marines did not fire on a man who approached them in daytime with a white flag. In the suicide blast that followed, one marine lost a leg.

"We didn't shoot him, because of that flag," the officer said.

Before the intel team arrived, a lone US Army officer arrived at the fire position, with a dozen Iraqi National Guardsmen, who wore red and white tape wrapped around their arms and thighs to distinguish them from the foe.

They sat down with Hamid, said they would go to his house to find his friend, but also made clear the risks, if Hamid was lying, and leading them into an ambush.

"He must understand," US Army Staff Sgt. Richard Fryar, from Waltham, Mass., told his interpreter to tell Hamid in Arabic. "If I or any of my men, American or Iraqi, get hurt or shot in any way, I'll shoot him dead."

"If he's lying in any way, he'll be punished all the way through," Staff Sergeant Fryar continued.

"We have to treat them all as insurgents, unless they prove otherwise," Fryar said later. "You don't know who to trust."

Hamid's trustworthiness was on the line when the Iraqi squad agreed to hike at dusk to his house, four blocks east and one block north from the US position. Burnt-out cars lined the route - every vehicle in the city has been treated like a potential car bomb, and shot up at a distance by US forces.

After the left turn into Hamid's narrow street, the level of tension shot up. The bodies of three prone corpses were being picked over by cats. A couple of rocket-propelled grenades - a favorite insurgent weapon - lay on the ground inside one garage gate.

"This looks like a prime spot for an ambush," Fryar said, urging his Iraqi unit to hustle, as they scanned the rooftops and houses for snipers, or any sign of attack.

Hamid, still wearing plastic cuffs, walked alone up the stairs to what he said was his friend's house. He banged on the metal gate. No one seemed to be home. The squad broke in, but the friend was not found inside.

"Where is he?" demanded Fryar of the young Iraqi. "If this is an ambush..."

To push home the warning, he grabbed Hamid by the scruff of his neck, forced him to his knees, and drew his pistol.

Hamid led them across the street, in his own house, where he was able to take the US officer and Iraqis directly to the AK-47 assault rifle hidden in a closet, with several full magazines, and a hunting rifle - precisely the weapons Hamid had described earlier.

Walking back to the Marine fire position, in the near darkness, the Iraqis shot back up the road, toward a four-man team of insurgents prowling the streets.

Later, the intelligence officer determined that the stories of both detainees - Hamid, who had surrendered, and a local guard - checked out.

They were to be escorted outside the city and then released. The word "RELEASE" was written with permanent ink on their forearms.

Amazingly, not many civilians have taken advantage of their opportunity to "surrender" yet.

Likely, the reason they won't let the Red Crescent into Fallujah yet is because then there would be witnesses to the real situation. As Tom Lasseter shows in this story, it isn't pretty.

When the troops rushed back, they lifted Sims' body into a pile of blankets and carried it into the closest Bradley.

Six soldiers and a reporter piled in after, trying not to step on the body.

In Baghdad, interim Minister of State for national security Qasim Daoud had announced that the city of Fallujah was now under control.

In the surrounding neighborhood, troops furious at the news of their fallen leader called in revenge, in the form of a 2,000 pound bomb airstrike and a storm of 155 millimeter artillery shells. A mosque lost half a minaret, its main building smoldering in fire and smoke.

In the back of the Bradley with Sims' body, no one spoke.

The only sound was Wright sobbing in the darkness.

Where are the injured "Iraqi forces?"

The AP reports that 412 new patients, nearly all injured in Fallujah have arrived at the U.S. military's Landstuhl Regional Medical Center this week. The U.S. military released casualty numbers today claiming 38 U.S. soldiers have died in the Fallujah offensive and 275 had been wounded. Those numbers don't add up, but what's really odd is that although 6 "Iraqi Forces" (those are the ones fight with the Americans instead of against them) have been reported killed, there are no numbers for wounded. Are injured Iraqis going to Landstuhl, also? Is that what accounts for the discrepancy between the military's numbers and the hospital's numbers? Where are the numbers for injured Iraqis and where are they being treated?

UPDATE: Cornum said 419 patients, including one American civilian, have been flown for treatment to Landstuhl since Nov. 8, the day after the offensive began against militants in Fallujah, 40 miles west of Baghdad. (Related item: Troops target insurgent holdouts in Fallujah)

She said 95% of those patients have come from Iraq, and 5% from Afghanistan. Most of those from Iraq were wounded in Fallujah, but Cornum could not say exactly how many.

There have been two peaks in the patient load: 98 arrived Thursday, 44 on Friday, 94 on Saturday, and 49 on Sunday, Cornum said. All of the patients have been U.S. citizens.

Saturday, November 13, 2004

Barghouti Bait

How bad do they want him?


Barghoutibait


Barghouti

Who will the Palestinians elect to succeed Yasser Arafat?

Lawrence of Cyberia points out the hypocrisy of the sudden favor the Bushistas are showing toward Palestinian democracy. A small bit of the conclusion of a well argued and linked post:

The U.S. refusal to countenance Palestinian elections unless they produce a ruler we like is symptomatic of a bigger problem in our Middle East policy in general, which is the absolute bankruptcy of the Bush Administration's much-vaunted claim to be bringing democracy to the region. Given a free choice, the people of the Middle East are not going to choose the CIA-backed pro-US Emirs, Kings and unelected Presidents that currently rule over them, so democracy is absolutely not on the cards and never was. (Remember Rumsfeld's comment two days after the invasion of Iraq that a Shiite-led Islamic government was "not going to happen"? Well, that's a pretty odd thing to say with confidence if you really plan to give a democratic voice to a country that is 2/3 Shiite and where the most respected community leaders are Ayatollahs, isn't it?).

Our policy towards the Middle East is basically built on the lie that we care about democracy when really we care about installing compliant Arab governments who will keep their populace in line, tone down the rhetoric against Israel and, where applicable, keep the oil flowing at a price Americans can live with. We need to find a new name for the regional order we are currently installing at the point of a gun in the Arab world, because whatever it is, it isn’t “democracy”.

Who will the Palestinians elect to succeed Yasser Arafat? Bet on it.

The Rape of Fallujah

Tom Knapp on the Rape of Fallujah. Read it.

Tom also makes a point that needs reinforcing here:

* "insurgent, n. A person who rises in revolt against civil authority or an established government; one who openly and actively resists the execution of laws; a rebel."

There are terrorists in Iraq, to be sure. There is also a resistance in Iraq, and I am certain that the two groups have a great degree of overlap; I try my best to distinguish between the two, including in RRND's headlines and content. There is not, however, an "insurgency" in Iraq, because there is no established government or civil authority for "insurgents" to rebel against. Quislings of an occupying military force do not constitute an established government or a civil authority.

Exactly so. The only sensible word for those who are resisting the occupation of Iraq is the "resistance." To call the Iraqi Resistance "insurgents" is to participate in the Orwellian propaganda of the Bush administration.

Friday, November 12, 2004

Pictures of Mass Destruction:

I'll let zeynep's excellent rant about this picture suffice:

Mosquebootsfallujah

Somebody please tell Lt. Brandon Turner that he's insane, that the Pentagon is insane, whoever is allowing the marines or any American soldiers "rest" on that "plush red carpet" with their shoes, uniforms and machines guns is insane. Does anyone understand anything about religious feelings in general or about Islam in particular? Have they spent even half a day watching a documentary or two about Islam and noticed that people carefully and respectfully take their shoes off before entering a mosque, where they will kneel and put their head on that carpet? (Those "plush red carpets", by the way, are prayer rugs, or"sajjade." And you don't step on them with your combat boots, especially inside a mosque, and smile for the cameras unless you really want to fight to the death with up to a billion people.)

Seriously, this is either the most arrogant, incompetent, ignorant occupation, ever, or the most clever, insidious, skillful effort towards bringing about an apocalyptic world war. Are they asleep at the awheel, drowning under their own ignorance, or simply want to end life on earth as we know it?

Liberating Fallujah

Liberated Fallujans:

Liberatedfallujans


From Raed Jarrar of Raed in the Middle

Thursday, November 11, 2004

Israel gets cracking on Arafat propaganda

"It is feared that after his funeral Arafat will become a national hero and freedom-fighter. We will launch a tough struggle to portray his murderous character and the fact that he is a strategist of world terror who hurt innocent people, both Israelis and American diplomats," said Ariel "The Butcher" Sharon.

From "Israel plans posthumous anti-Arafat campaign"

Warbloggers hope for chemical weapons to be used in Fallujah

Warfloggers are suddenly flogging a story alleging sarin nerve gas has been found in Fallujah. They seem to think this might finally prove that Saddam had banned weapons. However, those of us who inhabit the reality based community know that if there are chemical weapons in Fallujah, they almost certainly come from weapons bunkers which were under UN seal until the US waltzed in and started the Great Iraqi Free Weapons Bazaar.

Question for Warbloggers: If there are possibly chemical weapons in Fallujah, are the US troops in chem gear? If not, why not?

Iraqi Resistance scores 4 helicopters

Two Marine Super Cobra helicopters were shot down today, neither of them in the area where the US supposedly has the resistance trapped. One was northwest of Fallujah about 9 miles and the other was brought down about a mile south of Fallujah.

Yesterday, the resistance damaged two helicopters supporting the Black Watch. One helicopter's pilot was shot as he was headed for Baghdad from Camp Dogwood and the other was rocketed on the helo pad at the camp.

Mosul Meltdown

MOSUL, Iraq Explosions and gunfire are being heard in the Iraqi city of Mosul (MOH'-sul) as multiple police stations are being attacked.

Residents say they see gunmen roaming the city, setting police cars on fire and controlling some of the bridges.

A U-S military spokeswoman says "offensive operations" by U-S and Iraqi forces are under way to counter the police station attacks. She says Iraqi forces are in control of the bridges, and that the city isn't under attack "by any means."

Reuters reports:
Insurgents have set police stations ablaze, stole weapons and brazenly roamed the streets of Mosul as Iraq's third largest city appeared to be sliding out of control, residents said.

Explosions and fire from assault rifles and rocket-propelled grenades echoed across the city and columns of smoke rose from at least two police stations set alight. At least seven police stations have been attacked in the past 48 hours.

The US military issued a statement admitting that local security forces had been overrun in several areas and said local authorities were doing what they could to restore order.

"It's crazy, really, really crazy," said Abdallah Fathi, a resident who witnessed one police station being attacked.

"Yesterday, the city felt like hell, today it could be the same or worse."
[..]
As US forces battle to suppress insurgents in the city of Fallujah, west of Baghdad, it appears many fighters may have fled to other cities where they are launching new attacks.

In the past three days, there has been a step up in guerrilla activity in Samarra, Baiji, Baquba, Tikrit, Ramadi and parts of Baghdad - across the Sunni Muslim heartland.

In Mosul, a city of about three million people, insurgents attacked a group of Iraqi National Guardsmen blocking a bridge in the city centre, killing five of them and destroying three vehicles, witnesses said.

A cameraman working for Reuters filmed groups of militants emerging from a police station carrying police-issued AK-47s and bullet-proof jackets before setting the building on fire.

It doesn't sound as if the curfew is working very well.

Wednesday, November 10, 2004

All your propaganda are belong to us!

The Crusaders have found a Hostage Slaughter House in Fallujah! They know this how?

The general says soldiers found CD's and records of people seized by militants. He says soldiers also found "the black clothing" that the hostage-takers wore.
Now you know. Slaughterhouses have CDs, black clothes and papers in them.

I guess Allawi's cousin wasn't there, though. Or Margaret Hassan. Or any of the 130 odd current hostages in Iraq. Since Fallujah is "sealed off," there must be contingency Slaughterhouses elsewhere.

Tuesday, November 09, 2004

What if you throw an invasion and no one comes?

Scott Peterson of the Christian Science Monitor:

Despite the steady rumble of fighting, from frequent artillery and rocket explosions, to bursts of small arms fire across the city, US forces entered a veritable ghost town.
Lt. Gen. Thomas Metz, commander of ground forces in Iraq and of the U.S. Army's III Corps adds:
Speaking of al-Zarqawi, who is accused of beheading American and other hostages in grisly videotapes posted on the Internet, Metz said it was "fair to assume that he has left."
Imagine that.

UPDATE: Or, as Matthew Yglesias says:

Boy -- guerilla force flees rather than stand and be slaughtered by better-armed foe. Who could have predicted that except every goddamn person on the face of the earth.

Riverbend: Get out Americans.

Riverbend on Rumsfeld

So this is how Bush kicks off his second term. More bloodshed.

"Innocent civilians in that city have all the guidance they need as to how they can avoid getting into trouble,"

How do they do that Rumsfeld? While tons of explosives are being dropped upon your neighborhood, how do you do that? Do you stay inside the house and try to avoid the thousands of shards of glass that shoot out at you from shattering windows? Or do you hide under a table and hope that it's sturdy enough to keep the ceiling from crushing you? Or do you flee your house and pray to God you don't come face to face with an Apache or tank or that you aren't in the line of fire of a sniper? How do you avoid the cluster bombs and all the other horror being dealt out to the people of Falloojeh?

There are a couple of things I agree with. The first is the following:

"Over time you'll find that the process of tipping will take place, that more and more of the Iraqis will be angry about the fact that their innocent people are being killed..."

He's right. It is going to have a decisive affect on Iraqi opinion- but just not the way he thinks. There was a time when pro-occupation Iraqis were able to say, "Let's give them a chance..." That time is over. Whenever someone says that lately, at best, they get a lot of nasty looks... often it's worse. A fight breaks out and a lot of yelling ensues... how can one condone occupation? How can one condone genocide? What about the mass graves of Falloojeh? Leaving Islam aside, how does one agree to allow the murder of fellow-Iraqis by the strongest military in the world?

The second thing Rumsfeld said made me think he was reading my mind:

"Rule of Iraq assassins must end..." I couldn't agree more: Get out Americans.

Missing Missiles?

Looks like the missing missiles have been located.

Fallujah

The fog of war is dense over Fallujah. Until more information becomes available, here are a couple of informative posts on the Fallujah situation:

Noah Schachtman : Who Are Iraq's 36th?

John Robb: Target: The Fallujah TAZ

Monday, November 08, 2004

Doctors Liberated from the Fallujah Resistance!

In case you were wondering why the hospital at Fallujah is a "legitimate military target", this is how the US military justifies it:

The US military said insurgents had been in control of Fallujah General Hospital – located on the west bank of the Euphrates – and were “forcing the doctors there to release propaganda and false information”.

It underlined in a statement that when hospitals “are used for military purposes they lose … protected status”.

So, you see, the doctors of Fallujah hospital are now liberated and no longer have to release "propaganda and false information" like civilian casualty numbers. Undoubtedly, the Liberated Doctors of Fallujah will now release statements of gratitude and we'll hear harrowing tales of their captivity while in the clutches of the Resistance.


On this topic, see Rahul Mahajan and Under the Same Sun for commentary and photos.

Sunday, November 07, 2004

Chemical weapons in Fallujah?

Isn't it odd that although the resistance in Fallujah has allegedly vowed to use chemical weapons against the Americans that we hear none of the hullaba